 | | Re: figuring out prices
|
|
Dan, (...) Hmm... Well I would say, like all my Futuron sets would go for, their price to me is... priceless! :) Scott "No help at all" Sanburn ___...___ Scott E. Sanburn-> ssanburn@cleanweb.net Systems Administrator-Affiliated Engineers -> (URL) (...) (25 years ago, 19-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | figuring out prices
|
|
Well, I'm not sure where I should ask my question, so I'm asking here. The thing is we got a bunch of lego from a friend of Jenn's, and in it we (think) we have a few 1970's sets. We're wondering what they might be worth, but we'll never sell them. (...) (25 years ago, 19-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Can you say *** on Lugnet?
|
|
(...) be (...) Hrmmmm - some people (who say things they shouldn't be saying here, according to their agreement to the T&C) might think it is spam that they get an automated response reminded them that they shouldn't be saying things like that? My (...) (25 years ago, 17-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Can we define flogging?
|
|
(...) I think auctions get special treatment as an RTL reaction... auctions were the most obvious "hated" traffic, so they were singled out. Now that they're out of the way, some (most?) people are now expressing a similar distaste for any market (...) (25 years ago, 17-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Can you say *** on Lugnet?
|
|
(...) Well, no, not if it's worded nicely. Now, if a 'repeated' offender would get the same message over and over again - now that would be spam. But a 'repeated offender' as such would be needed to be dealt with differently... Is there a way to (...) (25 years ago, 17-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Can you say *** on Lugnet?
|
|
(...) That sounds like a good idea. The only problem that I can see is that some people might view the automated message as spam (even though it's not). Is anyone reading this besides you and me? Some more comment would probably be helpful here. -- (...) (25 years ago, 17-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Can we define flogging?
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) quasi-market-related (...) transactions. (...) whatever (...) cash. (...) From a market perspective, these types of posts probably belong in buy-sell-trade. I think it is reasonable to ask in shopping "could (...) (25 years ago, 17-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Can we define flogging?
|
|
It depends on what the definition of "flogging" is. Sorry, couldn't resist! :) Scott S. F.U.T. off-topic.fun or debate ___...___ Scott E. Sanburn-> ssanburn@cleanweb.net Systems Administrator-Affiliated Engineers -> (URL) Page -> (URL) Page -> (URL) (25 years ago, 17-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Can we define flogging?
|
|
(...) Rephrased statement: There are many more types and classes of non-auction market transactions than there are types and classes of auction transactions. (...) Heh heh! And how do you define that "plus whatever" part? :-) "Hey, TRU has this set (...) (25 years ago, 17-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Royal Knights treasure Carrier 6044 and others
|
|
(...) Really? Not in my opinion. Auction: Seller is selling something to the highest bidder. Sale: Seller is selling something for a set price to the first (?) person willing to pay the price. Yeah, auctions are different from sales, in execution. (...) (25 years ago, 17-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Royal Knights treasure Carrier 6044 and others
|
|
(...) I share this opinion. When I want to read market related posts I'll read the market groups. "Buy this from me" posts in themed groups bother me just as much as "I'm auctioning this" posts do. I've never understood the distinction. And frankly (...) (25 years ago, 17-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Royal Knights treasure Carrier 6044 and others
|
|
(...) This would be my personal preference - no market postings outside the .market hierarchy that aren't fairly clearly for non-market purpose. BUT, I'm aware that other people don't feel that way. Here's some of my reasoning, in no particular (...) (25 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Royal Knights treasure Carrier 6044 and others
|
|
(...) I suppose even black & white are shades of grey. :-) Scott A (25 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Royal Knights treasure Carrier 6044 and others
|
|
(...) The distinction between auctions and regular sales is bigger and clearer than the distinction between regular sales and other quasi-market-related things -- such as someone posting about a sale they found somewhere and then offering to buy & (...) (25 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Royal Knights treasure Carrier 6044 and others
|
|
<snipped> (...) 1. Whatever happened to the themed market group idea? 2. I do not think sale posts should be in theme groups if auction posts are not, as the distiction between the two is often not 100% clear to me (and others?). I'd leave them in (...) (25 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Royal Knights treasure Carrier 6044 and others
|
|
(...) At the risk of sounding like a broken record, we also need to clarify the position of non-auction market posts in non-market groups since everytime someone points out that perhaps a market post might be in the wrong place, someone jumps up (...) (25 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Royal Knights treasure Carrier 6044 and others
|
|
(...) The LUGNET Terms of Use Agreement, (URL) no requirement one way or the other regarding the place of regular sales postings. Only auctions are verboten by the LTUA. However, it's generally considered good netiquette not to spam theme groups (...) (25 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Book: The World Of Lego Toys
|
|
(...) ^^^^^^^ (...) ^^^^^^^^ (...) Kevin: Reminder: It is a condition of use of LUGNET that auction announcements be posted to .market.auction ONLY. Please take a few moments to review the Terms of Use Agreement: (URL) to lugnet.admin.terms] (25 years ago, 15-Mar-00, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.market.auction, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: Can you say *** on Lugnet?
|
|
(...) It wasn't a call, it was a prediction -- a doubt. (...) It's seeming more and more like it would be a useful feature to be able to flag an article and have some sort of gentle automated note sent to the poster as a conern. (To avoid followups (...) (25 years ago, 14-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: You wouldn't want one of these landing at your Airport!
|
|
I'd rather people didn't say it or any other swear word here. My kids do indeed say it, but that doesn't mean that I approve, nor does it mean that they don't know that it's wrong, because they do. There's no need to hurry up the growing up process (...) (25 years ago, 14-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
