Subject:
|
Re: Royal Knights treasure Carrier 6044 and others
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.terms
|
Date:
|
Thu, 16 Mar 2000 20:54:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3127 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.terms, Frank Filz writes:
> Todd Lehman wrote:
> > In lugnet.castle, Tamyra Teed writes:
> > > As I remember it.. if the Group charter agreed to allow some type of
> > > trading then it was ok.. I don't believe we have that understanding in
> > > .Castle, though I wouldn't mind if we did.. (Correct me on this if I'm
> > > wrong!)
> >
> > The LUGNET Terms of Use Agreement,
> >
> > http://www.lugnet.com/admin/terms/?p=agreement
> >
> > makes no requirement one way or the other regarding the place of regular
> > sales postings. Only auctions are verboten by the LTUA. However, it's
> > generally considered good netiquette not to spam theme groups with any kind
> > of sales postings, straight sale or otherwise.
>
> At the risk of sounding like a broken record, we also need to clarify
> the position of non-auction market posts in non-market groups since
> everytime someone points out that perhaps a market post might be in the
> wrong place, someone jumps up with the "it's against the T&C" and then a
> discussion ensues which finally ends when Todd reminds us that the T&C
> don't disallow non-auction market posts.
>
> I'm starting to get the feeling that perhaps the T&C should relegate all
> market posts to the appropriate group (other than the usual pointers to
> auctions listing something of historical note).
This would be my personal preference - no market postings outside the .market
hierarchy that aren't fairly clearly for non-market purpose. BUT, I'm aware
that other people don't feel that way.
Here's some of my reasoning, in no particular order:
1:If there is no rule, but only a custom, it can be ignored without worry.
2:People who ignore the custom actually get better exposure for their sale
than people who do respect the Lugnetiquette. I don't think the people
playing nice should be at this disadvantage.
3:Insert "Slippery Slope" reasoning here.
4:I'm a compartmentalized dork. If I'm reading castle, I don't want to see
market posts. If I'm reading .market, I don't want to see castle posts.
5:Quoting from above: "since everytime... market posts."
6:I'm lazy, and want things to be as easy as possible for me. :)
James
http://www.shades-of-night.com/lego/
I'm getting paid for this --> alladvantage.com
Sign up via me, the reference $$ go to fund Lugnet.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Royal Knights treasure Carrier 6044 and others
|
| (...) At the risk of sounding like a broken record, we also need to clarify the position of non-auction market posts in non-market groups since everytime someone points out that perhaps a market post might be in the wrong place, someone jumps up (...) (25 years ago, 16-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
