To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 9885 (-20)
  Re: How do I change my Member Name?
 
(...) Long ago, right after membership first opened, I sent a note to one of Todd's email addresses asking that 'Chris Weeks' be changed to 'Christopher Weeks' at the top of my member page. It never changed and I didn't pursue it, but if this thread (...) (23 years ago, 23-Dec-01, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: for the eyes of Suz (Was Re: For the Eyes of Alfred Speredelozzi
 
Okay, I am just catching up on this reading now. First of all, I was surprised by Tim's post for a few reasons. On one hand, I had no idea Tim felt this way. His opinion is pretty radical and different than any criticism I've heard about LUGNET so (...) (23 years ago, 23-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: How do I change my Member Name?
 
(...) <snip> You're right, I've wondered the same thing... how would someone who got married or otherwise change their name or status, make this change on their membership page? Since your question has gone unanswered for 2 weeks, I'm XP'ing it over (...) (23 years ago, 23-Dec-01, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: for the eyes of Suz (Was Re: For the Eyes of Alfred Speredelozzi
 
(...) Hi all, I am just another outside member of the community, contributing with naive reflections and ignorant posts. I like to write and usually regret my posts when they are ignored. In one respect though, I feel well versed, and that respect (...) (23 years ago, 23-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Eduardo is out of line (was: Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms")
 
"Christopher Weeks" <clweeks@eclipse.net> wrote in message news:Gor26t.98p@lugnet.com... (...) So, do you advocate a 'speech code' system for LUGNET? Careful, read this first: (URL) suggested reading - anything by Larry Elder. Look at it this way. I (...) (23 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: for the eyes of Suz (Was Re: For the Eyes of Alfred Speredelozzi
 
Hmmm...mmm, Well I can't say I agree totally with everything being said here; I know I haven't been here as long as most of you, but I'll reply nonetheless. I still view LUGNET as the center of the lego universe, I come here everyday, read lot's, (...) (23 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: for the eyes of Suz (Was Re: For the Eyes of Alfred Speredelozzi
 
(...) Here's one more. I'd be willing to dedicate at least two hours a day to curate lugnet.space as well as other tangential groups, and to coordinate my efforts with other curators. James' approach is excellent; which in a nutshell is to (...) (23 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Eduardo is out of line (was: Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms")
 
(...) Only for expressing the opinion, I think. (...) But then why do you support the mandate against profanity? I've assumed the goal of these rules is to make LUGNET a place where adults can do their thing and still be a place that parents are (...) (23 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms"
 
For what it's worth, I don't thing Eduardo means any harm at all. I think he is just plain clueless. Afterall, it is not easy for a person with a different cultural and language background to understand what is acceptable and what is not. For (...) (23 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: for the eyes of Suz (Was Re: For the Eyes of Alfred Speredelozzi
 
(...) Gentlemen, I'm with you all on this one. Kevin put it all in perspective saying "how can one volunteer if there's no response when one tries?". Twice now I've asked for a pair of curatorships (.build.mecha and .org.us.lugola) in an attempt to (...) (23 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Bad Links (Re: Endless Load/Unload and Transformer Train)
 
I am so sorry, I made a mistake, my homepage is (URL) legochina.virtulave.net Sorry again! Zhengrong (...) (23 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Bad Links (Re: Endless Load/Unload and Transformer Train)
 
(...) Zhengrong, You do some great work, but you may want to check your web links! I don't get to your RCX Controlled LEGO Train Projects, I get redirected to www_pay2k_com/portal! And if you use your back button to get back to LUGNET you get (...) (23 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: for the eyes of Suz (Was Re: For the Eyes of Alfred Speredelozzi
 
"James Brown" <galliard@shades-of-night.com> wrote in message news:Gops00.KAD@lugnet.com... (...) response. That's ok. I thought that the post in and of itself would invoke replies, but I was mistaken. At least I know Larry and I aren't alone in (...) (23 years ago, 22-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: for the eyes of Suz (Was Re: For the Eyes of Alfred Speredelozzi
 
James Brown wrote in message ... (...) to. (...) response. Moi aussi. There are things happening which really deserve an admin response. I also volunteered weeks ago to curate lugnet.town, both in the curators newsgroup and by email to Suz. No (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: for the eyes of Suz (Was Re: For the Eyes of Alfred Speredelozzi
 
(...) Hi Tim, If I'd realized you were looking for a community response, I would have stepped up sooner; I too am disappointed in the lack of administrative response. Personally, I suspect that Suz is approaching burnout WRT to Lugnet; It's a very (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general) ! 
 
  Re: for the eyes of Suz (Was Re: For the Eyes of Alfred Speredelozzi
 
After a couple days, I'm surprised, if not sad, this hasn't been replied to. By the admins or by people in the community who feel the same way. Lar and I have had a decent offline discussion on this, compared notes, and are definitely on the same (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Eduardo is out of line (was: Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms")
 
(...) I think there's a fine line here and IIRC the ToS is deliberately ambiguous on it. users are enjoined (by the discussion group terms) as follows: " 4. (do not) Post or transmit any unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Is Eduardo is out of line? (was: Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms")
 
(...) What does a gay-minifig look like??? Saskia (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Eduardo is out of line (was: Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms")
 
"Mark Sandlin" <sandlin@nwlink.com> wrote in message news:sandlin-2012012...ink.com... (...) His (...) can (...) opinion (...) So you can justify punishing someone for an opinion? I wouldn't approve of any racial slur being used, but that doesn't (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
 
  Re: Eduardo is out of line (was: Re: The Lego Group will attempt to stop some "brickfilms")
 
(...) Really? What if I were to use the "N" word? It's just an opinion, right? I'm sure racist or religious slurs wouldn't go over well, and likewise, neither should slurs about someone's sexual orientation. It's all hate speech. ~Grand Admiral (...) (23 years ago, 21-Dec-01, to lugnet.admin.general)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR