Subject:
|
Re: robotics sub-groups
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 22 Jan 1999 18:04:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1334 times
|
| |
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote
> > Lugnet.comp.lang
> No, lugnet.comp.lang would be any discussion about computer languages
> ('lugnet' implies that it should be LEGO-relevant, but it's not
> explicit). lugnet.robotics.lang would be better, I think. But Todd
> listed other possibilities which are better yet.
***Whoops***, I meant "robotics" instead of "comp" in that suggestion. I
agree that comp is NOT a good idea. A little usenet slip ;)
LINC
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: robotics sub-groups
|
| (...) No, lugnet.comp.lang would be any discussion about computer languages ('lugnet' implies that it should be LEGO-relevant, but it's not explicit). lugnet.robotics.lang would be better, I think. But Todd listed other possibilities which are (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
23 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
