Subject:
|
Re: robotics sub-groups
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 22 Jan 1999 17:48:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1352 times
|
| |
|
|
On Fri, 22 Jan 1999 16:38:16 GMT, "Linc Smith" <ldsmith@pfc.forestry.ca>
wrote:
> I could see
> Lugnet.robotics (as it is now but without the below topics)
> Lugnet.comp.lang
No, lugnet.comp.lang would be any discussion about computer languages
('lugnet' implies that it should be LEGO-relevant, but it's not
explicit). lugnet.robotics.lang would be better, I think. But Todd
listed other possibilities which are better yet.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: robotics sub-groups
|
| Steve Bliss wrote (...) ***Whoops***, I meant "robotics" instead of "comp" in that suggestion. I agree that comp is NOT a good idea. A little usenet slip ;) LINC (25 years ago, 22-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: robotics sub-groups
|
| Todd Lehman wrote in message <36a8875a.87082873@l...et.com>... (...) firmware or (...) I agree with Kekoa, having an alternate firmware group is good enough for now. At a later date it could be split if needed. As of now I think that LegOS and (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
23 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
