To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 1067
1066  |  1068
Subject: 
RE: Robotics sub-groups
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Mon, 15 Feb 1999 20:28:24 GMT
Viewed: 
7447 times
  
In lugnet.robotics, rhempel@bmts.com (Ralph Hempel) writes:
> Todd (I think) wrote:
> > [I would like to see legOS in its own group due to (a) its
> > popularity, (b) because its creator said he could really use a
> > dedicated group to help him focus on it, and (c) h8hforth may
> > need benefit from its own group someday.]
> 
> As the creator? of HFORTH, I would LOVE to have a gruop focused on
> it. As it stands I am up to my eyeballs in paying consulting work
> and my family, and barely have enough time to keep development
> going.

Ralph, which makes the most sense for the group name?  Ending it in
.h8hforth or .hforth or .forth?  How narrow or wide of a scope is most
suitable to the project?

I gather from your source that the "h8" component is derived directly from
"Hitachi H8/300," but I was unable to figure out what the "h" in "hFORTH"
stands for.  The reason I ask is because you mention on your h8hforth
webpage that other FORTH implementations (such as pFORTH) can be used to
test systems offline.


> [...] HFORTH will be more geared to a text interface with no need for
> a compiler, the FORTH kernel does it for you.  [...]

Cool, does this mean you can send it FORTH code in ASCII like you would send
a PostScript printer a PostScript program in ASCII?  It takes your program
source, compiles it on-the-fly into an interpretable internal form and away
it goes...?

--Todd



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Robotics sub-groups
 
This is just my opinion, but I don't think that the creation of separate groups for legos or h8forth would be a good idea right now. Although a dedicated group to discuss alternative firmware is a good idea, I think overspecializing it right now (...) (28 years ago, 15-Feb-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.robotics)
  Re: Robotics sub-groups
 
Hi Todd, I've received several requests to set up a dedicated legOS mailing list. A while ago, you suggested setting up a subgroup, and I'd like to take you up on your offer. Could you create something on the lines of lugnet.robotics.legOS? Thanks, (...) (28 years ago, 16-Feb-99, to lugnet.robotics)

Message is in Reply To:
  RE: Robotics sub-groups
 
(...) As the creator? of HFORTH, I would LOVE to have a gruop focused on it. As it stands I am up to my eyeballs in paying consulting work and my family, and barely have enough time to keep development going. Markus has done a great job on LegOS and (...) (28 years ago, 15-Feb-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.robotics)

23 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR