To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 1014
1013  |  1015
Subject: 
Re: Robotics sub-groups
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Sun, 7 Feb 1999 00:02:53 GMT
Viewed: 
5395 times
  
In article <MPG.1125ad3c5481bc509896a3@lugnet.com>, lehman@javanet.com
(Todd Lehman) wrote:

> 
> OYS!  (Oops, Yup, Sorry!)  NQC is a software development tool which runs on
> a non-RCX host machine and translates ASCII source code statements into RCX
> internal bytecodes intended to be downloaded to the RCX unit for execution,
> yes?

Exactly.

> 
> Would you classify NQC as RCX 'software' in the same sense as the other
> items above in the .rcx.sw.* hierarchy?  (All seem to be tool-software.)

Yes, that's good.

> 
> A second iteration then -- thinking long-term is the following
> conceivable...?
> 
>  lugnet.robotics                     Generic LEGO robotics
>  lugnet.robotics.events              Miscellaneous robotics events
>  lugnet.robotics.events.robot-arena  Robot Arena focus group
>  lugnet.robotics.rcx                 High-level RCX discussions
>  lugnet.robotics.rcx.fw              General RCX firmware
>  lugnet.robotics.rcx.fw.h8hforth     h8hforth focus group
>  lugnet.robotics.rcx.fw.legos        legOS focus group
>  lugnet.robotics.rcx.hw              General RCX hardware
>  lugnet.robotics.rcx.sw              General RCX host software
>  lugnet.robotics.rcx.sw.botcode      BotCode focus group
>  lugnet.robotics.rcx.sw.brickcmd     BrickCommand focus group
>  lugnet.robotics.rcx.sw.gbp          Gordon's Brick Programmer focus group
>  lugnet.robotics.rcx.sw.mindctl      Mind Control focus group
>  lugnet.robotics.rcx.sw.nqc          NQC focus group
>  lugnet.robotics.rcx.sw.rcxcc        RCX Command Center focus group


One issue would be the potential merging of nqc/rcxcc since rcxcc is
really a front end to nqc and shares the same language/constraints/etc.
This is really a matter of philosophy - separate groups means that rcxcc
users will probably subscribe to both groups, and nqc only subscribers may
potentially miss an interesting topic in rcxcc.  On the other hand,
merging the groups would mean nqc users would see some rcxcc specific
stuff that they don't care about.  Its really up to you on how fine a
"resolution" you make these things.

Dave

--
reply to: dbaum at enteract dot com



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Robotics sub-groups
 
(...) Well, I want the resolution that's most beneficial to the individual projects and most enjoyable for participants. Fine resolution is good as long as it lives up to the promise of providing for more focused discussions but bad if it is so fine (...) (28 years ago, 14-Feb-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.robotics)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Robotics sub-groups
 
(...) OYS! (Oops, Yup, Sorry!) NQC is a software development tool which runs on a non-RCX host machine and translates ASCII source code statements into RCX internal bytecodes intended to be downloaded to the RCX unit for execution, yes? Would you (...) (28 years ago, 6-Feb-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

23 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR