Subject:
|
Re: Carrying rec.toys.lego on lugnet.com
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 8 Jan 1999 05:19:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1660 times
|
| |
|
|
cjc@NOSPAMnewsguy.com (Mike Stanley) writes:
> Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote:
> > Ug, in any scenario, it means some very careful newsserver custom-mods and
> > testing which would derail other stuff. :-(
>
> Screw that. I'm sure you consider certain other things to be of
> greater importance than this, so spend your time on them. I know I
> think there are many things in the master Lugnet plan that aren't here
> yet that vastly outweigh carrying rtl here. :)
Indeed. (Hence the "Ug." :-)
But thanks for making me clarify in no uncertain terms that I agree with you
wholeheartedly. I think the RTL thing has been discussed and re-discussed
enough to dismiss as (a) something that's not an immediate emergency, and
(b) something that is likely to create as many new problems as it solves,
and (c) a harmful time sink. I don't regret ever having brought it up,
though -- because I'm glad to have a clearer picture of the issue.
--Todd
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Carrying rec.toys.lego on lugnet.com
|
| (...) Screw that. I'm sure you consider certain other things to be of greater importance than this, so spend your time on them. I know I think there are many things in the master Lugnet plan that aren't here yet that vastly outweigh carrying rtl (...) (26 years ago, 8-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
26 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
