To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 7395
7394  |  7396
Subject: 
Re: Pruning not good for the trees
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Wed, 9 Aug 2000 03:34:36 GMT
Viewed: 
4004 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> Now, it's a gray area, of course.  Let's say TLC asked me to remove set
> number 1886 from the database.  If they asked that, I'd politely refuse,
> because I know that I obtained the information about the set first-hand
> through the 100% legitimate channel of LEGO Shop-At-Home Service on the
> phone.  So, there's an example of information which TLC probably doesn't want
> out and about, yet which they would have no grounds for calling the removal
> of.

Todd, what would you do if someone posted set numbers and names that they had
legitimately obtained from www.lego.com?
(see http://news.lugnet.com/lego/direct/?n=549 )

--Dave



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Pruning not good for the trees
 
(...) Nothing, of course. --Todd (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Pruning not good for the trees
 
(...) Well, hmm, I guess you have a good point. It depends on who you consider to have done editing when you raise the question of editorial control. For example, I certainly do not think that I exercised any editorial control -- not by any stretch (...) (26 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

33 Messages in This Thread:










Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR