Subject:
|
Re: Pruning not good for the trees
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 9 Aug 2000 03:34:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
201 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> Now, it's a gray area, of course. Let's say TLC asked me to remove set
> number 1886 from the database. If they asked that, I'd politely refuse,
> because I know that I obtained the information about the set first-hand
> through the 100% legitimate channel of LEGO Shop-At-Home Service on the
> phone. So, there's an example of information which TLC probably doesn't want
> out and about, yet which they would have no grounds for calling the removal
> of.
Todd, what would you do if someone posted set numbers and names that they had
legitimately obtained from www.lego.com?
(see http://news.lugnet.com/lego/direct/?n=549 )
--Dave
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Pruning not good for the trees
|
| (...) Well, hmm, I guess you have a good point. It depends on who you consider to have done editing when you raise the question of editorial control. For example, I certainly do not think that I exercised any editorial control -- not by any stretch (...) (24 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
33 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
