To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 7348
7347  |  7349
Subject: 
Re: Pruning not good for the trees
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Tue, 8 Aug 2000 03:54:27 GMT
Viewed: 
213 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Matthew Miller writes:
Larry Pieniazek <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote:
Needs to be done in such a way that nothing remains of the post itself at
all except the anchors so it's clear that no editorial control was being
done, it was just a nuke.

I'm pretty sure removing things like this is editorial control, wholesale or
not.

Prolly. But removing the whole thing is "less" control than excising words but
leaving the rest. Or so I seem to recall Prodigy's lawyer telling me about 15
years ago when I first started looking into this topic. And "less" control,
especially when forced by a third party, theoretically gives you a better
defense in case the snippee sues. Or so I recall.

Now, we certainly could debate whether TLC has the authority, or whether Todd
does, or whether he should or not assuming he does. But that's not what I was
posting about. I'm just looking for a technofix to this completely shattered
tree. At this point even the parts of the tree that are a ways away from the
prunes are still not threading properly in the nested tree display on the web.

Let's talk about that. It's more interesting than the same old ground we talk
about when this sort of thing comes up. No one's opinion is going to change
anyway, right? :-)

++Lar



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Pruning not good for the trees
 
(...) Hmmm...that's alarming...that shouldn't be happening. Are you SURE? What's the URL of a thread display, for example, that's not threading properly? I ask because of the way lugnet newsgroup canceling works -- when an article is canceled, it (...) (24 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Pruning not good for the trees
 
(...) I'm pretty sure removing things like this is editorial control, wholesale or not. (24 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

33 Messages in This Thread:










Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR