Subject:
|
Re: Pruning not good for the trees
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 8 Aug 2000 23:46:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
216 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote:
> I don't think that's a correct assumption. According to BradJ and LSI Legal,
> this was information (especially the pricing, which could change between now
> and the release) which was not intended for the public and should never have
> been made available to the public. LEGO considers it privileged information
> between themselves and their trade partners (i.e., Target in this case). I
> would wager that Target has some serious explaining to do, of course I can't
> speak for them or for LEGO and we will have to wait and see what they turn up
> in their investigation.
Well, I will chime in here by saying that Meijer has a policy
considering things of this nature to be company sensitive. I know that
the Systems department have special rules in regards to situations like
this.
Scott S.
--
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Pruning not good for the trees
|
| (...) I don't think that's a correct assumption. According to BradJ and LSI Legal, this was information (especially the pricing, which could change between now and the release) which was not intended for the public and should never have been made (...) (24 years ago, 8-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
33 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
