Subject:
|
Re: Creating Lugent Rating Criteria
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 21 Apr 2000 17:51:45 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@^StopSpam^mattdm.org
|
Viewed:
|
5559 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote:
> First way: If two people like a message a lot (and, say, each mark it 100),
> then it has a lower composite score than, say, several dozen people all
> marking it 100. This is because of the automatic softener-vote[1] by the
Yes, I understand that, but what about two people liking a message a lot vs.
several dozen saying that it's mediocre? Those are quite different.
> Second way: The coloring of the rating symbols is two-dimensional. Its input
Ah. Yes, that's much better. (Does MS Win still only use 20 colors for text,
or can you use anything now?)
> words, the color saturation is how seriously to take the rating. It's subtle,
> but it's like that on purpose so that, basically, the more red you see, the
> more your eye is drawn to it. (Red, biologically, has the strongest draw of
> all colors, for non-colorblind humans.)
Red also has connotations of "Warning", "Stop", and "Negative", doesn't it?
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
Boston University Linux ---> http://linux.bu.edu/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Creating Lugent Rating Criteria
|
| (...) Two people liking a message a lot would have a composite score of 60 to 70. Several dozen saying that it's mediocre would have a composite score of 0 to 30, depending on how you define "mediocre." A low score with a lot of input shows up dark (...) (27 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Creating Lugent Rating Criteria
|
| (...) There are two ways, currently -- but they're designed to work without getting in the way (rather than to be obvious). First way: If two people like a message a lot (and, say, each mark it 100), then it has a lower composite score than, say, (...) (27 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
48 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
