Subject:
|
Re: Creating Lugent Rating Criteria
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 22 Apr 2000 03:33:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2333 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Matthew Miller writes:
> > The first choice sends a "-" (meaning "undefined") to /news/rate.cgi as
> > input. The second choice sends a 75; the third choice sends a 100.
>
> Has the interface for rate.cgi changed at all? (I assume not.) I'll
> probably hack slrn this weekend to have rate keys...
It hasn't yet, but it will need to. It will need to reject input values of
0, for one thing -- in order to prevent abuse. (The HTML pages submit either
"-", "75", or "100", but that doesn't limit other clients.) Probably it will
need to only accept that set of three inputs -- or do something to snap to
the closest value in that set. :-)
> PS -- choice of characters rates a °°. :)
Huh?
--Todd
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Creating Lugent Rating Criteria
|
| (...) Does that mean the current 2-choice incarnation is the final one? If the score display in the group-view is only limited to three choices (bad/neutral,good,excellent), then there isn't the same danger of feelings getting hurt - so why not (...) (25 years ago, 22-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Creating Lugent Rating Criteria
|
| (...) :) yay! thanks. (...) Has the interface for rate.cgi changed at all? (I assume not.) I'll probably hack slrn this weekend to have rate keys... PS -- choice of characters rates a °°. :) (25 years ago, 22-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
48 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
