Subject:
|
Re: Creating Lugent Rating Criteria
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 22 Apr 2000 04:48:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2450 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Richard Franks writes:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> > Probably it will need to only accept that set of three inputs -- or do
> > something to snap to the closest value in that set. :-)
>
> Does that mean the current 2-choice incarnation is the final one?
Not neccessarily, no. It's conceivable (hopefully unlikely) that the whole
thing is still no good. Need to gather a couple days of feedback, I think,
and switch tasks.
> If the score
> display in the group-view is only limited to three choices
> (bad/neutral,good,excellent),
Three choices -- neutral, excellent, way excellent -- no bad.
> then there isn't the same danger of feelings
> getting hurt - so why not reinstate the 11-point scale, and just display the
> results (if at all) in the new gentler fashion? Wouldn't this be a lot better
> from a table and search-sorting perspective? IMHO that is more important than
> showing the results in the group-view :) (esp when the group-view indicators
> are toned-down as to be almost meaningless)
OK, I think I see what you're saying. Well, it might be safe to allow inputs
of, say, 50 through 100, but allowing 10 or 5 as an input (as it currently
does) is, for all practical purposes, like allowing 0.
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Creating Lugent Rating Criteria
|
| (...) Does that mean the current 2-choice incarnation is the final one? If the score display in the group-view is only limited to three choices (bad/neutral,good,excellent), then there isn't the same danger of feelings getting hurt - so why not (...) (25 years ago, 22-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
48 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
