Subject:
|
Re: Creating Lugent Rating Criteria
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 23 Apr 2000 13:49:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2569 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> If we're down to just three choices, suggest that each choice get its own
> submit button. That's faster even than a radio button, and WAY faster than the
> current drop down list. And that improves usability from a human factors
> perspective.
That's already been asked and answered (in the depths of this thread!) - reason
for not doing it is because when you use the list view (>1 post on same page)
it's more efficient just to have one submit button.
> Of course I realise that ease of use may not be your highest sort criterion
> when deciding what your LDT priorities are, and none of the rest of us have
> visibility to either the criteria or the priority list, which is fine.
True, but if we did it might quell the frequent "When is X likely to be
implememted?" questions? Although it wouldn't help stop the repeated "what
about doing this?" suggestions which might only be quelled by some sort of
feature/suggestion area, rateable or not :)
Richard
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Creating Lugent Rating Criteria
|
| (...) If we're down to just three choices, suggest that each choice get its own submit button. That's faster even than a radio button, and WAY faster than the current drop down list. And that improves usability from a human factors perspective. Of (...) (25 years ago, 23-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
48 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
