Subject:
|
Re: Creating Lugent Rating Criteria
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 21 Apr 2000 13:56:07 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm.orgNOMORESPAM
|
Viewed:
|
1287 times
|
| |
|
|
Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> wrote:
> Note that I suspect that implementing multidimensional ratings, while an
> awesome idea, will require a lot of LDT, EIther the current numbers need to be
> ripped out and replaced or something very crufty needs to be done.
Good suggestions. I'd like to flog my personal dead horse here :) and note
that it'd be nice to just have ONE button/checkbox for each scale. You'd
still end up with continuum of scores, but based on the total number of
people who pressed the button.
I don't think that much is lost with this approach, and it radically
simplifies the interface -- especially if there are going to be multiple
scales.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
Boston University Linux ---> http://linux.bu.edu/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Creating Lugent Rating Criteria
|
| (...) Hey.. there's a cue for dead-horse floggage in this group ;-) (...) It does have some benefits - how would the "off-topic" button work though if the message was cross-posted, and assuming that it wasn't off-topic in every group? Also - that is (...) (25 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Creating Lugent Rating Criteria
|
| In lugnet.admin.general, Nicholas Allan writes: <consider using Relevancy and Quality as dimensions> Agreed that these are two. I nominated Newsworthiness and Long Term Usefulness as well. A post that told us all of a huge and very cheap sale that (...) (25 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general) !
|
48 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
