Subject:
|
Re: Decisions (Was: Re: Creating Lugent Rating Criteria)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 21 Apr 2000 15:50:22 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
1701 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Richard Franks writes:
<snip>
> I trust that Todd put a lot of individual thought into the original system, but
> that didn't stop confusion and peoples feelings getting hurt. The replacement
> should be thought out *very* carefully.
>
> Within minutes of the original system coming online, several people had
> pinpointed potential problems - many of which came to life. Maybe LUGNET should
> go back to its roots and have an 'experimental' test server or area which could
> test out new features, and give an idea of the technical and social problems
> that could be caused. No matter how smart Todd is, a group of indivuals using
> LUGNET via a test-interface/server/whatever will always be able to come up with
> more insights than one person.
>
> This would also stop confusion and annoyance to casual users who (suprise!)
> just want to talk about LEGO, and don't care that much about the latest fun
> features.
what if there was a group .admin.server to discuss and test new features? That
way, we'll move this traffic from .admin.general, (since I agree that it
doesn't really belong here), and have a playground to test new things, without
affecting the casual user... In this case, the rating system would have been
tested only in that group, before being released to all of lugnet...
:)
Dan
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
48 Messages in This Thread:
  
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
