Subject:
|
Re: Creating Lugent Rating Criteria
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 22 Apr 2000 04:29:16 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@SPAMLESSmattdm.org
|
Viewed:
|
2900 times
|
| |
|
|
Richard Franks <spontificus@__nospam__yahoo.com> wrote:
> It's the category in which all the bad and neutral posts will live (unrated).
Do you think that this:
> If there are going to only be three choices, then I'd prefer buttons - one
> click instead of click,locate,scroll,unclick,locate,click.
would reduce the perception that unrated = bad? (Assuming that the button is
labelled something like "spotlight"?)
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
Boston University Linux ---> http://linux.bu.edu/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Creating Lugent Rating Criteria
|
| (...) It's the category in which all the bad and neutral posts will live (unrated). (...) If there are going to only be three choices, then I'd prefer buttons - one click instead of click,locate,scroll,...ate,click. Richard (25 years ago, 22-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
48 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
