Subject:
|
Re: Creating Lugent Rating Criteria
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 24 Apr 2000 02:24:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2434 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
> Three choices -- neutral, excellent, way excellent -- no bad.
That's another way you could arrange the form:
Comments? * No comment * great post * excellent post [Submit]
where * is a radio button.
Just my .02
--Bram
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Creating Lugent Rating Criteria
|
| (...) I was just saying "neutral, excellent, way excellent" in reply to something as a means of clarification. We'd actually like to avoid any kind of qualitative judgment type words in the choices. By saying "Highlight" and "Spotlight" (assuming (...) (25 years ago, 24-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Creating Lugent Rating Criteria
|
| (...) Not neccessarily, no. It's conceivable (hopefully unlikely) that the whole thing is still no good. Need to gather a couple days of feedback, I think, and switch tasks. (...) Three choices -- neutral, excellent, way excellent -- no bad. (...) (...) (25 years ago, 22-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
48 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
