Subject:
|
Re: Creating Lugent Rating Criteria
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 22 Apr 2000 04:44:00 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2487 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Matthew Miller writes:
> Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote:
> > 0, for one thing -- in order to prevent abuse. (The HTML pages submit either
> > "-", "75", or "100", but that doesn't limit other clients.) Probably it will
> > need to only accept that set of three inputs -- or do something to snap to
> > the closest value in that set. :-)
>
> Ok. I'll make my script just use those. (Or rather, just the last two; I
> won't bother with the -.)
The "-" choice is actually helpful in case you hit the wrong key and
accidentally give input when you didn't mean to. (Or maybe, like LarryP,
you don't ever make misteaks :-) But I use it at least once a day! :)
> > > PS -- choice of characters rates a °°. :)
> > Huh?
> I like it, of course.
I thought you meant something like that, but I didn't (still don't) know what
you mean by "choice of characters rates." I assume you mean that you approve
of the choice of characters -- there's some meta-thing going on there. :)
--Todd
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Creating Lugent Rating Criteria
|
| (...) If we're down to just three choices, suggest that each choice get its own submit button. That's faster even than a radio button, and WAY faster than the current drop down list. And that improves usability from a human factors perspective. Of (...) (25 years ago, 23-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
48 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
