Subject:
|
Re: Decisions (Was: Re: Creating Lugent Rating Criteria)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 22 Apr 2000 03:24:22 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
1659 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Dan Boger writes:
> what if there was a group .admin.server to discuss and test new features?
> That way, we'll move this traffic from .admin.general, (since I agree that it
> doesn't really belong here), and have a playground to test new things, without
> affecting the casual user...
I think something like admin.server would be useful, at the moment normal
admin.general traffic is getting drowned. Maybe admin.playground would convey
the testing-ground message?
> In this case, the rating system would have been
> tested only in that group, before being released to all of lugnet...
At the moment, members have cookies that tell LUGNET to munge up a slightly
different version of the interface (ie the rating options). If there was a pool
of volunteer-testers then these testers could have cookies too to let them try
out new features - they wouldn't actually have to use a different server - and
they could still fully participate in LUGNET, just seeing a different version
of the web-interface.
The best thing would be that you could make whatever changes you wanted, but
only the testers would see them.. and the testers wouldn't cause a fuss as they
had signed up because they wanted to help - no casual LUGNET users would get
burned.
If this post has any salient points (it is 4am+), then I'd happily be a
volunteer tester.
Richard
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
48 Messages in This Thread:
  
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
