Subject:
|
Re: Creating Lugent Rating Criteria
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 23 Apr 2000 00:47:13 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
!
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
2258 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Richard Franks writes:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
>
> > OK, there are now two choices (down from 5, down from 11 originally) in a
> > drop-down list...
> >
> > CHOICE ACTION
> >
> > - - - No action (default choice).
As I've said before and as I believe others are saying, there is a possibility
that a linear scale, no matter if it has 100, 10, 5, 2 or only a binary
setting, doesn't work, as article attributes are not one dimensional.
Therefore all the tinkering with how many choices there are and what symbols to
use and so forth may not be addressing the root problem, if there is one.
++Lar
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Creating Lugent Rating Criteria
|
| (...) What about "No Opinion"? I thought it was heavy negative until I tried submitting it and investigated why it had no effect. (...) What if you really dig a message, but you don't think it's relevant to the spotlight - ie - a message on this (...) (25 years ago, 22-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
48 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
