Subject:
|
Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful? (was: New feature: Article rating)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 21 Apr 2000 17:32:24 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
2791 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Shiri Dori writes:
> Yes, definitely yes.
> If your post isn't recommended, it doesn't mean anything... just that it's
> not recommended. No hard feelings (or at least less hard than "low ratings").
Also thinking of making a rating of 0 (lowest) not count -- i.e., be exactly
the same as inputting no opinion at all. In other words, there would be a
way not to recommend to read something (naturally) but no way to recommend
not to read something. This way, _only_ positive things could be "said" via
the input. Negative input would be the same as no input. This would
effectively discard the ability to penalize someone for what they've posted.
It would be a loss of useful functionality, but overall, we're probably better
off if that aspect of functionality doesn't exist, since (a) few people are
relatively emotionless and (b) this is just a hobby, after all. We're here to
have fun, to do positive things, not to begrudge each other accidentally or
on purpose.
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
309 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
