|
James Brown wrote:
> 4:I think everyone has to take a step back, let things cool for a while, and
> then approach this fresh. We are seeing the same kind of weird escalation we
> saw before with the IP/catalogue scans debate, and I really, REALLY don't want
> to see this go farther up.
Seconded. And what's so funny/sad about it is that Frank is basically
looking for calm and reason too! We're so on edge about this that even a
call for peace and reasoned discussion can set off debate.
If Tamy comes away deciding not to offer her stuff at all, we've really
screwed up.
In another post, Frank said that maybe we should stop trying to police
Lugnet for Todd. I think a lot of us, in a well meant attempt to take
the load off Todd, have been trying to do that, informally. Frank may
well be right, it's not working well, because of the nuances of
interpretation.
That may be. Or maybe it's the informality. I have to trot out my old
suggestion of using small groups of people who are formally vested with
some standing and who consult with each other to make sure they're being
consistent and reasonable and fair before taking action.
--
Larry Pieniazek - lpieniazek@mercator.com - http://my.voyager.net/lar
http://www.mercator.com. Mercator, the e-business transformation company
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.
Note: this is a family forum!
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
17 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|