Subject:
|
Re: Clarification of rules please
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 10 Feb 2000 17:04:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
278 times
|
| |
|
|
> With respect to this issue, it's great that TLC will be taking a more • active
> role here, as not only will they be able to clarify such questions • (assuming
> that Brad succeeds in getting some of their legal counsel online) but they
> will also be able to assume the entire burden of addressing potential
> transgressions, especially the gray areas like this one.
OK, I'll be devil's advocate this time.
1. What are the benefits of sacrificing even a little independence to get
cosy with TLC? I'm sure they will listen to what we say just the same if we
do not, they may even value our independence more than our sycophancy?
LUGNet is great for bringing us all together, and gets rid of the Chinese
whisper problem associated with word of mouth distribution of data. To me,
the internet is about getting the latest news fast (BTW : John Barnes has
just been sacked -
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/uk/scotland/newsid_637000/637415.stm), not
waiting for the newspapers to be printed and then scanning them on to the
web.
2. What if Huw's posts last year was just a huge ploy be TLC to get our
attention?
Scott A
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Clarification of rules please
|
| (...) But in this case, I certainly don't see photos of products there which haven't already been announced and publicized by TLC in year-2000 consumer catalogs (US & Germany)...do you? I suppose some of the new (to us) photos of those (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
26 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
