Subject:
|
Re: Clarification of rules please
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 11 Feb 2000 03:26:57 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
cjc@newsguy.#spamcake#com
|
Viewed:
|
342 times
|
| |
|
|
On Fri, 11 Feb 2000 02:13:31 GMT, "Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com>
wrote:
> In lugnet.admin.general, Mike Stanley writes:
> > > With respect to this issue, it's great that TLC will be taking a more active
> > > role here, as not only will they be able to clarify such questions (assuming
> >
> > Did I miss something? I haven't seen a word from Brad or anyone else
> > from LEGO since well before Christmas.
> >
> > If I have missed something and there is more definite info that has
> > been posted about when and how LEGO will be taking a more active role
> > here, please point me to it.
>
> Nope, AFAIK, you haven't missed anything. But you did snip all the but the
> first word of my parenthetical disclaimer. :-.
Wasn't interested in anything that followed "here", just didn't delete
back to that point.
I guess I was trying to find out if I had missed any new developments
that would make it more obvious that LEGO WILL BE taking a more active
role here, because it is obvious that they have NOT done so to this
point.
--
The parts you want and nothing else?
http://jaba.dtrh.com/ - Just Another Brick Auction
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
26 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
