To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 1926
1925  |  1927
Subject: 
succession strategy if catastrophe
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Mon, 28 Jun 1999 20:32:15 GMT
Viewed: 
131 times
  
In lugnet.general, Larry Pieniazek writes:
In lugnet.general Todd Lehman wrote:
This place will be here for as long as the net is around and there are
LEGO enthusiasts on the net who want to talk about it, which could be
indefinitely but I figure at least must go until 2025.

Sounds good. BUT... (Not to be morbid, but...) what if you and Suzanne
are hit by a bus tomorrow? What will happen to Lugnet then?

That would be bad.  People would have to get together and talk to Pair
Networks and explain to them what happened and ask for inside-access to
(comandeer, but in a nice way) the server to do the various admin stuff
and finish up everything that's not done.


I ask not
because it's any of my business or because I have a "right" to the fine
services provided here, but because I think of the impact that premature
demises have had (James Jessiman, Gary Louie to a lesser extent) on
stuff, and I shudder.

I understand.  I think it's a good and valid question.


We recovered in both prior instances because there was a community. But
Lugnet provides the community matrix. If the server stops running, what
then?

Some sort of semi-distributed backup system would probably be the best thing.
One way to do this is to have a couple of independently owned caching NNRP
servers somewhere which contain complete copies of the news database, and
somewhere to have copies of things like the Pause/Lugnet sets DB and other
things.  It could also be done by making periodic tarballs of major system
components and storing these in a permanent medium with one or two or more
trusted compatriots.  Maybe burning them on CD-ROM or something.

The software that runs things below all the data is also something that's
currently proprietary but planned to be released as open-source software
someday when it stabilizes (maybe in the year 2000).  That would help lessen
the potential for catastrophe.


What IS your succession strategy? Does your will speak to it? Do you
have apprentices?

Maybe a will would be a wise idea.  Like you said, not to be morbid, but.

Say, would you be willing to take tarballs of a few things and burn them on
CD-ROM and hold onto them in case of something really bad?

--Todd



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: succession strategy if catastrophe
 
(...) I'm sure he is, but I also have a relatively massive pipe to the net, so I could do it also. I routinely transfer 4-8 gb per week anyway, so snagging a few hundred megs or more wouldn't even be a drop in the bucket. (25 years ago, 28-Jun-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
  Re: succession strategy if catastrophe
 
(...) Actually, that wouldn't be -too- bad. No one would probably even notice anything had happened for one or two weeks (and then only because of silence). It would probably take about a week to satisfy red-tape requirements (whatever they are; (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jun-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Is it Just Me or is the RTL on its way out!?
 
(...) Sounds good. BUT... (Not to be morbid, but...) what if you and Suzanne are hit by a bus tomorrow? What will happen to Lugnet then? I ask not because it's any of my business or because I have a "right" to the fine services provided here, but (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jun-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)

39 Messages in This Thread:












Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR