 | | Re: "Some pigs are more equal than other pigs"
|
|
(...) Do me a favour and explain it again for me, because I have read the previous postings, and I didn't see what the specific consequences of this asserted privacy violation were. We're going really slowly here to make sure that there is no (...) (20 years ago, 23-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: "Some pigs are more equal than other pigs"
|
|
(...) If you missed them go back and re-read the previous postings. (...) It's pathetic that you can carry on with this and feel you have any credibility as a Lugnet administrator. -Ken (20 years ago, 23-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: "Some pigs are more equal than other pigs"
|
|
(...) The attacking part came with the messing it up part it's an other issue. (...) What happend within a smaller group is not an invitation to take it public. (...) No I feel fired. Ken (20 years ago, 23-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: "Some pigs are more equal than other pigs"
|
|
(...) I'm not sure it's a given. What consequences do you feel are directly attributable to my actions? Please be specific by giving the specific action I took, and the consequence that directly followed? (...) I'm not sure you've demonstrated that. (20 years ago, 23-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: "Some pigs are more equal than other pigs"
|
|
(...) That wasn't for you to decide. (...) “I can't imagine him messing up this spectactularly." (...) Up untill you felt the need to screw with a public invitation and further can't take responsibility for your actions I felt no animosity. (...) (...) (20 years ago, 23-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: "Some pigs are more equal than other pigs"
|
|
(...) That is true. (...) I don't think that it explicitly says the opposite, but regardless, you have a point. On the other hand, if Larry divulged personal information about you without knowing that it was private, do you think it is accurate to (...) (20 years ago, 23-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: "Some pigs are more equal than other pigs"
|
|
(...) Assuming the information is "personal" rather than "common knowledge". (...) I'm not sure what Ken means here, some elaboration might be helpful. What is it that I've been picky about, exactly? And how does my being "picky" correlate to the (...) (20 years ago, 23-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: "Some pigs are more equal than other pigs"
|
|
(...) There is no clause that say’s it’s ok to divulge personal information if you didn’t know the person did not want it divulged. In fact it say’s exactly the opposite. If you don’t specifically have permission it is wrong. Friends could perhaps (...) (20 years ago, 23-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: "Some pigs are more equal than other pigs"
|
|
(...) Ok, I'm looking at the ToU agreement: (URL) do you mean that his divulging of your association with LEGO without your permission violated point #6 of the Discussion Group Terms and Conditions? That is to say, do you feel your privacy was (...) (20 years ago, 23-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: "Some pigs are more equal than other pigs"
|
|
(...) No, but divulging personal info without permission is obviously a violation of TOU (...) Hurtful no, but an obvious attack especilly when he himself has been so picky within debate forums where there should be more latitude for this type of (...) (20 years ago, 23-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: "Some pigs are more equal than other pigs"
|
|
Hi Ken, (...) We're talking about this post: (URL) you feel that his associating your name with LEGO Brand Retail was a personal attack? Did you find his wording involving the words "messing up" hurtful? Was it the act of replying publicly to make a (...) (20 years ago, 23-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: "Some pigs are more equal than other pigs"
|
|
(...) Thank you Todd, This has nothing to do with the exchange between Larry and Ken, but since I wanted to comment on your last paragraph I see no better place to post. As a member I appreciate you stating that a "feeling" is valid, and that it is (...) (20 years ago, 23-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: "Some pigs are more equal than other pigs"
|
|
(...) What can be more clear than the original post? Followed by the fact that instead of a simple appology to the library and NILTC that he had no buissnes spoiling their post he continues to make excusses and avoid responsibility. Conduct quite (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: "Some pigs are more equal than other pigs"
|
|
(...) Hi Ken, I don't think David is looking for a fight. I think many of us are curious about this because it is all so public. You obviously felt that Larry's comments were a personal attack against you, and first I want to acknowledge to you that (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: "Some pigs are more equal than other pigs"
|
|
(...) SNIP (...) I don't care what you think. I've detailed the awnsers to every one of your questions elsewhere in the thread. Others have agreed with me. This is not a debate forum. If you are looking for a fight move on. Ken (20 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: The whole story?
|
|
(...) This is what I thought at the onset of the problem. I thought just because his name was every where in the community he was to be respected. From talking to others I've found out I was wrong. Respect is earned not granted because one is there. (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The whole story?
|
|
(...) No I passed along public information as witnessed by the fact I found it throught normal public channels. (...) Don't know what they wanted announced but the fact is the horse was out of the barn. (...) My assessment is the fact that you are (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: "Some pigs are more equal than other pigs"
|
|
(...) I don't see how you could construe it as a personal attack. He explicitly said that he thought you WEREN'T responsible for the error. Besides, even if he DID think you were responsible, it was him pointing out the error, not accusing you of (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: The whole story?
|
|
(...) wow, I guess I've been away for a while. I'm not even following this thread - I read only Lar's and this one. But it's enough for me to see that there's rudeness being flung toward those who deserve the community's respect. This is directed at (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX) !!
|
| |
| | Re: The whole story?
|
|
Snipped a lot of stuff to get to the crux. (...) So you're not denying that you did in fact pass around unannounced information? (regardless of source, it was unannounced, right?) (...) Irrelevant. Was it unannounced at the time? If so, are you (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
