 | | followups in Outlook
|
|
With everyone keen on keeping the right post in the right place (which I'm all for) I'll have to admit to getting a bit lost. Is there any way in Outlook to set a followup to a specific group? I can XPost fine but not set a followup Outlook (...) (23 years ago, 29-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) You are correct. Analogous to another relatively recent admin.general discussion, if you don't reply publicly to the effect, no one knows you did what you did, and we are left to assume that the issue is left unchecked. If you want to admonish (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) If I called up someone on the phone and said, "Hey friend, I think that was a little over-the-top" I don't think you would know. If we, at one of our monthly meetings brought up the faux pas that was posted in the newsgroup--again, I don't (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: While we're on a kick of appropriate posting...
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Tim Courtney writes: <snip> (...) <snip> It is relevant to post the original post in .general, but it should be followed up in .market.brickshops. I do not have a problem with cross posting this kind of thing for interest's (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: While we're on a kick of appropriate posting...
|
|
"Matthew Gerber" <matthew@digitaliris.com> wrote in message news:GqMrtn.4t1@lugnet.com... (...) discussion (...) community (...) I gotta agree with Matt here. This is something of interest to everyone who uses BrickBay - and not eveyrone visits (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: While we're on a kick of appropriate posting...
|
|
(...) Not true...I've only used Brickbay once (a very good experience, I've just not needed anything else)...I never go there normally. I happen to think that the issue is important to the community in general (no pun intended), so I added .general (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: While we're on a kick of appropriate posting...
|
|
Matthew Gerber wrote in message ... (...) community (...) Nope, it's only of interest to people who buy Lego off Brickbay. Not everyone does, and even if they did, the appropriate area for the discussion is in the .market heirarchy or on the (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: While we're on a kick of appropriate posting...
|
|
(...) Or is that (now moved...again) thread of "general" interest to the community at large? A lot like the .announce argument (now mostly solved), .general reaches a broad audience, and is a good starting place to get to a large number of folks and (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | While we're on a kick of appropriate posting...
|
|
Is anyone else as bothered by me about lugnet.general appearing to be used as a "I'm not a Compartmentalized Dork so I'm going to not use appropriate newsgroups" place? We've got a raging discussion about use of "bay" going on, plus just so many (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: .market Curators
|
|
(...) Or would directing this stuff to the right group help a bit? Matt FUT lugnet.admin.curators 8?) (23 years ago, 26-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.curators)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) I understand that each subcommunity is different. I'm not for strict adherence to the exact same set-in-stone standards for every obscure group on LUGNET. At the same time, each group should be mature and good-natured enough to practice (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: .market Curators
|
|
(...) Well, even though I volunteered publicly, and even though I think you'd make a fine curator for either or both group hierarchies, I'm thinking now, on second thought that it may be more appropriate to send notes to the Admins (for volunteering (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | .market Curators
|
|
(...) to (...) I would be willing to be curator for a few .market groups. When I read Lugnet daily, the first places I always look are the .market groups. I am very comfortable there and I think I have a very good perspective of what is needed and (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) I can't think of a single currently active participant who remotely seems to go out of his or her way to police newsgroups. And the only person I can think of at all who may have had the appearance of policing was just trying to be helpful. (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) Me either. As I said in my first email to David (perhaps using a not very good analogy didn't make that point very clear, admittedly). (...) Me too, me either. (...) I did but it didn't address that point. I may have been unclear but as I said (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
"David Koudys" <dkoudys@redeemer.on.ca> wrote in message news:GqIEps.3H6@lugnet.com... (...) over. If that's what you think of the people (including myself) who are doing the policing, you don't know us well enough. I certainly don't scour LUGNET (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
David Koudys wrote in message ... (...) of (...) all (...) Disclaimer: I am not in any way an admin, just a concerned community member. Anyone who posts on LUGNET agreed to the TOS when they signed up. From the TOS ((URL) not) Post or transmit any (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
Hmm, I was trying to get myself out of this discussion... I for the most part would like to see the same picture David espouses. The problem that I see is that when people make these little "nudges", the "offender" takes offense and yells "why are (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Duane Hess writes: <Snip> (...) Wow, that cleaned up pretty good! Let's cut to the end of the tape... Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) is not a good thing. I'll tell you why: First thing-no names please--whatever (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: E-mail hyperlinks on LUGNET
|
|
(...) "test with name" fails on both IE 5.0 passing to Outlook 2000 and on IE 5.0 passing to Outlook 98. It appears the format failure is the "Joe Blow" part of the link. HTH James (23 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
