 | | Re: While we're on a kick of appropriate posting...
|
|
(...) Not true...I've only used Brickbay once (a very good experience, I've just not needed anything else)...I never go there normally. I happen to think that the issue is important to the community in general (no pun intended), so I added .general (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: While we're on a kick of appropriate posting...
|
|
Matthew Gerber wrote in message ... (...) community (...) Nope, it's only of interest to people who buy Lego off Brickbay. Not everyone does, and even if they did, the appropriate area for the discussion is in the .market heirarchy or on the (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: While we're on a kick of appropriate posting...
|
|
(...) Or is that (now moved...again) thread of "general" interest to the community at large? A lot like the .announce argument (now mostly solved), .general reaches a broad audience, and is a good starting place to get to a large number of folks and (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | While we're on a kick of appropriate posting...
|
|
Is anyone else as bothered by me about lugnet.general appearing to be used as a "I'm not a Compartmentalized Dork so I'm going to not use appropriate newsgroups" place? We've got a raging discussion about use of "bay" going on, plus just so many (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: .market Curators
|
|
(...) Or would directing this stuff to the right group help a bit? Matt FUT lugnet.admin.curators 8?) (23 years ago, 26-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.curators)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) I understand that each subcommunity is different. I'm not for strict adherence to the exact same set-in-stone standards for every obscure group on LUGNET. At the same time, each group should be mature and good-natured enough to practice (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: .market Curators
|
|
(...) Well, even though I volunteered publicly, and even though I think you'd make a fine curator for either or both group hierarchies, I'm thinking now, on second thought that it may be more appropriate to send notes to the Admins (for volunteering (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | .market Curators
|
|
(...) to (...) I would be willing to be curator for a few .market groups. When I read Lugnet daily, the first places I always look are the .market groups. I am very comfortable there and I think I have a very good perspective of what is needed and (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) I can't think of a single currently active participant who remotely seems to go out of his or her way to police newsgroups. And the only person I can think of at all who may have had the appearance of policing was just trying to be helpful. (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) Me either. As I said in my first email to David (perhaps using a not very good analogy didn't make that point very clear, admittedly). (...) Me too, me either. (...) I did but it didn't address that point. I may have been unclear but as I said (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
"David Koudys" <dkoudys@redeemer.on.ca> wrote in message news:GqIEps.3H6@lugnet.com... (...) over. If that's what you think of the people (including myself) who are doing the policing, you don't know us well enough. I certainly don't scour LUGNET (...) (23 years ago, 26-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
David Koudys wrote in message ... (...) of (...) all (...) Disclaimer: I am not in any way an admin, just a concerned community member. Anyone who posts on LUGNET agreed to the TOS when they signed up. From the TOS ((URL) not) Post or transmit any (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
Hmm, I was trying to get myself out of this discussion... I for the most part would like to see the same picture David espouses. The problem that I see is that when people make these little "nudges", the "offender" takes offense and yells "why are (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Duane Hess writes: <Snip> (...) Wow, that cleaned up pretty good! Let's cut to the end of the tape... Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) is not a good thing. I'll tell you why: First thing-no names please--whatever (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: E-mail hyperlinks on LUGNET
|
|
(...) "test with name" fails on both IE 5.0 passing to Outlook 2000 and on IE 5.0 passing to Outlook 98. It appears the format failure is the "Joe Blow" part of the link. HTH James (23 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: E-mail hyperlinks on LUGNET
|
|
(...) Is there a chance to get the names removed from the pages? I was talking to a web guy here at work and he says the fault lies in the hyperlink. In order to be compatible with as much software as possible the hyperlink should use only the email (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Do you think there is a market for your MOCs on eBay? Please discuss...
|
|
(...) I agree (...) Does the market hierarchy HAVE a curator yet? How does one tell if it does or not, if the curator hasn't put their name at the bottom? (I checked and did not see it at the root or in .shopping, didn't check them all) .trains (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.market.theory, lugnet.market.auction, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Non ISO charaters (was Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there i
|
|
(...) This is an RFC2047 encoded header, which is the preferred way to transfer 8-bit characters in header fields. RFC2047 dates to 1996, and should be implemented in most user agents. It has not been implemented in the LUGNET web interface? It is (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: E-mail hyperlinks on LUGNET
|
|
(...) So what you're asserting is that LUGNET isn't in conformance to spec but that it works for some mailers because their implementation isn't as spec-picky? The thought of an MS product being better at spec conformance is shocking. Until you (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.faq, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Non ISO charaters (was Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there i
|
|
(...) Hee-hee...no offense taken! I understand, 'cuz here's what your mail link looks like on my Macintosh: Fredrik =?iso-8859-1?q?Gl=F6ckner?= <fredrik.glockner@bio.uio.no> (...) I'm web interface, and of course, it looks just fine to me posting or (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
