Administrative : Search Results: internet mail service


Administrative / Search Results: internet mail service

Results 1821 – 1840 of 2225.

Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: Babelfish question (was Re: Cross posting in eu (was: Aaargh!)
Followup-To: lugnet.publish. (...) Yup. For reference, that link is currently: (URL)Babelfish) way to skip the form page entirely? I think you are saying there (...) As far as I can tell, though skipping the form page is possible, but they don't (...) (25 years ago, 22-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish)

mail
(score: 0.220)

		Re: Robotics subgroups by mail (was: sensors)
(...) I would think the support of Michael Gasperi and Brian Stormont would be important here, since this would be moving a certain amount of traffic down to a lower level rather than creating new traffic from scratch (where there is no loss but (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.admin.general)

mail
(score: 0.220)

		Re: Mailing list gateways
(...) Help me out a bit on that -- When you say "doesn't really need to be," do you mean to suggest that those types of discussions are too esoteric for here? Heh heh -- we've got a special newsgroup here now just for weekly announcements of LEGO (...) (26 years ago, 19-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

service
(score: 0.220)

		Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
(...) Nope, it's not. It's a very close analogy to what Jasper posted: "Yes, it is. Anything on an unsecured webserver is being published." Which you refute much more logically below. (...) Yes, but we're disagreeing on what consitutes "documents (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

mail
(score: 0.220)

		Re: YEAR-2000 LEAKS STOP HERE
(...) Todd, I think this is extremely reactionary. The way I read the law and the ToU, I think posting links to those pictures is both legal and reasonable. The posting of scans obtained by somewhat unknown means is a different matter that I don't (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

mail
(score: 0.220)

		Re: Cats and pigeons...
(...) off the (...) The analogy is flawed. It is illegal to walk out with unpaid-for gum. It is the internets intent to disseminate information. If you post it on your site, you are saying "Hey, look at this". That is how it works out practically (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

mail
(score: 0.220)

		SLRN and canceling messages
Hey Todd -- I figured out why I can't cancel messages from within slrn. For some reason, when generating a cancel message, SLRN doesn't attach the real name, just the e-mail address. That is, for a regular message, it does: From: mattdm@mattdm.org (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

mail
(score: 0.220)

		Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
Thanks for the extremely clear (and reasonable) policy on catalog scans. It is now clear that the retailer catalog is not to be shared (even old ones, I guess those need to come down) in any form. I hope that everyone who has continued to offer to (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)

mail
(score: 0.220)

		New newsgroup lugnet.loc.is
A new newsgroup for LEGO enthusiasts in Ìsland (Iceland) has just been created. CHARTER/PURPOSE ===...=== -> lugnet.loc.is (group): Ìsland (Iceland) lugnet.loc.* (hierarchy): General-purpose discussion groups for LEGO® enthusiasts, for hundreds of (...) (25 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.loc.eu, lugnet.loc.is, lugnet.loc.dk, lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.loc.no, lugnet.loc.se, lugnet.loc.fi)

mail
(score: 0.220)

		Re: S&H Technic Sale via MindStorms e-mailing
(...) I agree that personal person-to-person email [1] should never be posted (or even mentioned the vast majority of time) or forwarded without permission. Unsolicited (or barely solicited) commercial advertisements I view as the equivalent of (...) (25 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

mail
(score: 0.220)

		New newsgroup lugnet.loc.eu
A new wide-spanning newsgroup for LEGO enthusiasts in Europe (European Union and European countries) has just been created. This will help minimize massive crossposting in the case of wide topic discussions such as a European LEGO Fest. (...) (25 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.loc.eu, lugnet.loc.at, lugnet.loc.be, lugnet.loc.cz, lugnet.loc.dk, lugnet.loc.de, lugnet.loc.ee, lugnet.loc.gr, lugnet.loc.es, lugnet.loc.fr, lugnet.loc.ie, lugnet.loc.it, lugnet.loc.lu, lugnet.loc.hu, lugnet.loc.nl, lugnet.loc.no, lugnet.loc.pl, lugnet.loc.pt, lugnet.loc.ru, lugnet.loc.ch, lugnet.loc.sk, lugnet.loc.si, lugnet.loc.fi, lugnet.loc.se, lugnet.loc.tr, lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.loc.us, lugnet.loc.il)

mail
(score: 0.220)

		Re: S&H Technic Sale via MindStorms e-mailing
(...) I agree. However, I'm (personally) wondering if these postings might fall under the TBD "leaks" category. These e-mails seem to be pretty targeted and dont't say that they can be re-sent. I've read (URL) and Larry's dear-lego request but I (...) (25 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.admin.general)

mail
(score: 0.220)

		Re: Enhanced verification (was: Re: What the F.......)
(...) I just did a little test with sending a Distribution: header via Agent, and it gets stripped off the mail (somewhere). Presumably because Distribution: is only defined for NNTP, and not SMTP. I was actually thinking of using the Approved: (...) (25 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

mail
(score: 0.220)

		Re: US S@H Phone Specials 1/11/99 - 1/17/99
(...) <snip> (...) <snip> (...) Yep they do. Garshk, how do we get around this? Who ever thought this would be so difficult? The group name criteria should contain: 1) Lego (so as to denote its officialness); 2) Shopping (or the clear idea of (...) (26 years ago, 14-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

service
(score: 0.220)

		Re: Help: Re: review: LEGO '99
David Schilling: (...) Correct. (...) The first one is slightly too general. People do refer to part #3001 quite often (but it is mostly other parts that are referenced by number). (...) Seriously. Lugnet has only existed for a year (or is it two?). (...) (25 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

mail
(score: 0.220)

		Re: Enhanced verification (was: Re: What the F.......)
<snip> (...) I like this idea although I don't understand how it would help in terms of the issue we are currently discussing. Would this require someone to sign in once a day the first time they go to LUGNET? If so does that mean you would be using (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

mail
(score: 0.220)

		Enhanced verification (was: Re: What the F.......)
In lugnet.dear-lego, Brad Justus wrotes: (...) I've been cogitating on this from a technical standpoint and I think I have come up with a general workable solution, all things considered. I agree that if something can be done, it should be done. (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)

mail
(score: 0.219)

		Re: What happened?
(...) Which mailing list? I'm looking in the lugnet.com server logs for outgoing mail, and it's still sending out news by e-mail. I'm also still receiving digests daily. However, someone else wrote and mentioned that their mail had stopped. By (...) (25 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.admin.general)

mail
(score: 0.219)

		Re: Time for LUGNET Legal Aid? (was: Remy is in the clear)
(...) The NNTP posting interface supports both cancel and supersede, the latter being what you want. What happens with the mail interface when a message is being cancelled or superseded? I realize, of course, that mail that has already been sent out (...) (25 years ago, 11-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

mail
(score: 0.219)

		Re: Cats and pigeons...
First off, I just want to say that I can see my previous attitude in a different light. I trust that the parties involved understand that there is no need to flame me via e-mail. Having said that, after seeing how quickly the situation on lego.com (...) (25 years ago, 13-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

mail
(score: 0.219)

More: Next Page >>