Subject:
|
Re: US S@H Phone Specials 1/11/99 - 1/17/99
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 14 Jan 1999 23:14:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1685 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman writes:
> "Linc Smith" <ldsmith@pfc.forestry.ca> writes:
>
> > Yes, I thought that there would be a good description of what the group was
> > on that page and it is true that you can watch the group for a while, but
> > this shouldn't mean a more explanative name can't be used.
>
> Very true, there's nothing inherent which precudes the use of a more
> descriptive name, if possible (all things considered).
>
>
> > Lugnet.shop-at-home.sales
> > Lugnet.shop-at-home.promotion
> > Lugnet.shop-at-home.whatever
> >
> > Lots of room for expansion. All meet the length and character requirements,
> > and I feel these are just more user friendly (similar to other names on
> > Lugnet)
<snip>
> If the ng is really for low-bandwith announcements LEGO Shop At Home Service
> phone specials, then I think it ought to have both "lego" and "service" in
> the name -- either spelled out or in acronym form -- if it also contains
> "shop" and "home."
>
> I don't want us to bastardize the official name "LEGO Shop At Home Service" • <snip>
>
> BTW, when the S@H reps answer the phone, I think they rarely say the full
> name "LEGO Shop At Home Service," but don't they pretty much always say
> "LEGO Shop At Home"? (As in, "Good morning, LEGO Shop At Home... Would you
> like to place a catalog order?")
Yep they do.
Garshk, how do we get around this? Who ever thought this would be so
difficult? The group name criteria should contain:
1) Lego (so as to denote its officialness);
2) Shopping (or the clear idea of shopping, which is looking *and* buying)
3) Home (shopping from there)
4) Service (it is a service)
and not be:
5) too long - max 14 chars each (sub)group
6) too many subgroups, thereby still keeping short the hierarchal path
7) cryptic
lsahswps? Lego Shop at Home Service Weekly Phone Specials? %@*$&#! Just
looking at the subject of this thread makes me shake my head. Mike includes
all the info necessary, and then tacks on the date. I'll have to think about
this some more. *mental belch*
-Tom McD.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: US S@H Phone Specials 1/11/99 - 1/17/99
|
| Todd Lehman wrote in message <369e6a6a.1859138@lu...et.com>... (...) ever (...) vast (...) Yes, I thought that there would be a good description of what the group was on that page and it is true that you can watch the group for a while, but this (...) (26 years ago, 14-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
