Subject:
|
Re: Charter for lugnet.announce.lsahs
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 17 Jan 1999 07:42:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2018 times
|
| |
|
|
cjc@NOSPAMnewsguy.com (Mike Stanley) writes:
> Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote:
> > Mike, in terms of a brief charter, how does this sound?--
> >
> > Unofficial announcements pertaining to LEGO Shop-At-Home Service:
> > Summaries of weekly U.S. phone specials and other notable specials.
>
> Sounds good.
Okie dokie then, I'll throw the switch and make it go. You could re-post
this week's specials there if you wanted to test it, once it's up.
> > Like lugnet.announce, the new lugnet.announce.lsahs group will require that
> > followups be set to another group -- to prevent discussions from taking
> > place in the group.
> >
> > For posting the weekly S@H specials, I would suggest the following settings:
> >
> > Newsgroups: lugnet.announce.lsahs,lugnet.market.shopping
> > Followup-To: lugnet.market.shopping
> > or
> > Newsgroups: lugnet.market.shopping,lugnet.announce.lsahs
> > Followup-To: lugnet.market.shopping
> >
> > Mike, does this all sound OK to you then?
>
> Well, since both involve posting to both groups, I'll go with either.
> :)
OK. Now here's the pedantic/esoteric hidden-question: Which one of those
two alternatives do you think makes the most sense?
Do you want to have it on record that (second alternative) the threads you
post there were all rooted in the .shopping group and the announcements just
happened to be echoed into the .announce.lsahs group (that's the second
alternative), or that (first alternative) the postings you make there are
rooted squarely the .announce.lsahs group, with the discussions just
happening to be spin-offs that happen in the .shopping group? Depends on
how you view the resource.
The only difference in terms of how the data is archived is which ng later
shows up in the URL when you click on an article in a thread -- for example,
both of the following URLs take you to the same article:
http://www.lugnet.com/news/display.cgi?lugnet.general:1981
http://www.lugnet.com/news/display.cgi?lugnet.admin.general:771
but since lugnet.general was listed first in the 'Newsgroups' header, the
first one is the one that gets used for indexing and linking purposes when
you're browsing the archive.
In other words, it's just a matter of which ng you want people to get popped
into by default when they click up an old article via the web interface...
In any case, whichever of the two orderings that you choose, it's probably
good to be consistent from week to week.
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Charter for lugnet.announce.lsahs
|
| (...) Hrmmm, I think it makes more sense to me to have the post originate in the .shopping group but get echoed to the .announce.lsahs group. The .announce.lsahs group, imo, is a matter of convenience for people who want to drop in (or have it drop (...) (26 years ago, 17-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Charter for lugnet.announce.lsahs
|
| (...) Allrighty then, I count four people (Gary L, Ben G, Tom McD, and me) who are in favor of the name being lugnet.announce.lsahs and no one yet directly opposed to that specific name. Linc S listed some other possibilities (...) (26 years ago, 17-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
