Results 181 200 of about 2200.
|
Search took 0.02 CPU seconds.
|
|
| | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
| (...) LUGNET is a free, mostly self-regulating community of FOL's, primarily of the A- variety, but with a few T- and K- types thrown in as well. Putting stricter systems in place to restrict and censor the tone of conversation in so-called (...) (20 years ago, 24-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
| |
| internet (score: 0.586) |
|
| | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
| (...) Neither does it obligate him. Parents need to start taking paying attention to what their kids are viewing online, and every attempt to make the internet kid-safe only reinforces their false beliefs that there is nothing that their kids can (...) (20 years ago, 23-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp, FTX)
| |
| internet (score: 0.586) |
|
| | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
| (...) From the main page: Where minds connect: You are not alone! LUGNET is home to thousands of LEGO fans of all ages. We are a community which never sleeps and has been called "the friendliest place on the Internet." So it seems it has always (...) (20 years ago, 22-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp, FTX)
| |
| internet (score: 0.585) |
|
| | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
| (...) Well, the first line is "where minds connect". I agree with that assessment. Now, I'm not really sure what being "home to thousands of LEGO fans of all ages" means. Certainly many people come to LUGNET to connect, but is it really a "home"? (...) (20 years ago, 23-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp, FTX)
| |
| internet (score: 0.585) |
|
| | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
| (...) Is it truly an irrelevant detail? If it was, wouldn't that NOT create discrimination? True, on a day to day basis, for the most part, we don't care if any individual is LGBT, married, single, straight, young, old, or whatever. But Lugnet is (...) (20 years ago, 22-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
| internet (score: 0.585) |
|
|
| mail (score: 0.585) |
|
| | Re: Why these news groups were created
|
| In lugnet.admin.nntp, Todd Lehman wrote: <SNIP> (...) By taking the premise of this site and adding specific adult themed groups, you've opened the door for what so many parents cringe about the internet. Now, thanks to this unilateral decision, we (...) (20 years ago, 21-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp, FTX) !
| |
| internet (score: 0.585) |
|
|
| mail (score: 0.585) |
|
|
| mail (score: 0.585) |
|
|
| internet (score: 0.585) |
|
| | Re: Serious group requests
|
| (...) that, but she thinks its strange the number of heated arguements we have here. Granted, she is biased by the fact that she's married to someone fairly reactionary, so she see's a skewed version of things. However, even if I were a mostly (...) (20 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
| internet (score: 0.585) |
|
|
| internet (score: 0.585) |
|
|
| internet (score: 0.585) |
|
|
| mail (score: 0.584) |
|
| | Todd! Admin and owner
|
| *Well, maybe I do not have the knowledge to speak/write in the language oher than my own, but hey, I'm here to learn* Todd! I think that the service you provide us/me is more than I/we could ever have been asking for. I think that the service you (...) (24 years ago, 21-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| mail, service (score: 0.582) |
|
| | Re: Not getting e-mail from Lugnet?
|
| (...) I have recently received at least one message from around 3:30 Comparing the Web Interface to the email one, It does seem like at least some of the New messages are getting through. ( I can't tell for sure because I can't remember which groups (...) (24 years ago, 19-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| mail, service (score: 0.582) |
|
| | Replying to the bottom? [was Re: I hate MOCPages]
|
| (...) Hmm.. I guess it depends. When I trim, I usually trim things that are completely unrelated to my reply. Otherwise, I tend to leave it all in. I know its bandwidth heavier, but in this day and age, I think we should expect to be able to send (...) (20 years ago, 2-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| internet (score: 0.582) |
|
| | In support of Larry
|
| I'm ashamed of all the Larry-bashing that's been taking place. If you've only interacted with the man online (which I believe is the case with some of his harshest critics), you have no perspective on who he really is. Hence, you're really not (...) (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.people) !
| |
| service (score: 0.582) |
|
| | Re: wish's - Contest canceled
|
| In lugnet.admin.general, Tim Courtney wrote: <snip> (...) Dave, Don't and not cancel each other out so what you get is "I'm strongly advocating for you to *be( stopped as well as posting this in public either." Sticking to issues not people, I find (...) (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| service (score: 0.582) |
|
| | Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
|
| (...) The current process is unweildy, but it's what we've got now. This issue, among others, is helping to define what the policy and process *should be* rather than what they are right now. But as it stands, that's what it is, and that's what we (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| service (score: 0.582) | More: Next Page >>
|