|
 | | Re: Out-of-office replies, mail header suggestion
|
| (...) The real problem is mail servers which send the "out-of-office" to the list, which on some list software which hasn't been fixed to deal with it generates a cascade of bad messages (when in addition, the mail server doesn't just send one (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|  
mail
(score: 0.272)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.272)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.272)
|
|
| | Re: Giving bad trader info (Re: Bad Trader Alert!)
|
| (...) Hmm... I guess I just don't see it as a generally good practice. I'm actually not sure if there are any specific laws against it, but I also wouldn't be suprised to find out that there are-- after all, there are laws governing businesses that (...) (25 years ago, 1-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
service
(score: 0.272)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.271)
|
|
| | Out-of-office replies, mail header suggestion
|
| Hi Todd, I received an Out-of-office reply from someone who is subscribed via LUGNET's newsgroups per mail feature. This isn't really a problem but I noticed that the header generated by LUGNET contains the following line: "Precedence: list" however (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.271)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.271)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.270)
|
|
| | Netscape is annoying....
|
| Hrmmm....seems every time I reply to a message Netscape likes to send a copy via e-mail to the person I'm replying to. I've looked all over the netscape settings box and I can't find anything about it. I have Communicator 4.72. I know if I (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.270)
|
|
| | Re: Netscape is annoying....
|
| (...) Hrmmm....nope....no extra buttons here....just the one (...) No siree....straight from ftp.netscape.com :) (...) hehe....I know - me neither. Okay sorry this isn't in .test but I used the "reply to newsgroup" option from the right-click menu (...) (24 years ago, 3-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.270)
|
|
| | Re: Netscape is annoying....
|
| (...) Hmm, I use 4.75 at home, I think I've also used 4.72. In my Communicator, the row of buttons has two reply buttons, one for reply to newsgroup and one for reply to sender and newsgroup. Also, if I click the reply to sender and newsgroup, the (...) (24 years ago, 2-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.270)
|
|
| | Re: Hey Todd
|
| Thanks, I must have mis-read something. More than likely I will be sending $10 a month. 8) Tim, did you get my e-mail I sent thanking you for your help? -- Kenneth A. Drumm Ph.D. who supports things he believes in. "Tim Courtney" <tim@zacktron.com> (...) (24 years ago, 29-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.269)
|
|
| |
|
internet
(score: 0.269)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.269)
|
|
| |
|
internet
(score: 0.268)
|
|
| | Re: Message-ID -> Article number
|
| (...) I don't read the articles via mail, so the former is of little use, I'm afraid. And so is the latter, because I use Leafnode to read news offline. This means that the LUGNET articles get a different article number on my local news spool. So (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.268)
|
|
| | Re: Message-ID -> Article number
|
| (...) 1) They're gunky looking. 2) They contain no useful information to a human. 3) They can be very, very long. I've seen some here bigger than 80 characters in length. That makes them unsuitable for URLs. 4) The thought of putting NNTP ID's in an (...) (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.268)
|
|
| | Re: Message-ID -> Article number
|
| (...) while this might not be what you need, notice that messages you get via mail from lugnet have this header attached: X-Message-Archive: (URL) you can link to that message directly, or just as "lugnet.year.2002:24"... :) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.268)
|
|
| | Re: Excessive Cross Posting
|
| (...) it does - I think. When you post to .annouce, even from mail or nntp, doesn't it require a followup? if so, adding a few other rules to that check should be quite possible... (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.268)
|
|
| | Re: Excessive Cross Posting
|
| (...) I guess I should have clarified that I don't think the current round of excessive cross posting is jerks, I'm just pointing out that trivial things like requiring a follow-up header when cross posting doesn't remove the possibility of jerks (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 0.268)
|
