|
 | | Re: New group suggestion
|
| (...) Hmm, the rationale being what? (Not disagreeing, just unclear on the motivation behind it.) To increase (encourage) more FOTW posts? To make FOTW's easier to find? To make FOTW's come and find you (by subscribing to the group via e-mail?) I'm (...) (25 years ago, 21-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|  
mail
(score: 1.176)
|
|
| | Re: Multiple votes for CLSotW possible?
|
| Well I don't know if this helps a bit but this is the hidden source from one of my page's forms: <input TYPE=IMAGE SRC="../../submit.jpg" NAME="E-Mail" ALT="Submit the form!"> <input type=hidden name="recipient" value="fusion@refraxion.com"> <input (...) (25 years ago, 23-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.176)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.176)
|
|
| | Re: Multiple votes for CLSotW possible?
|
| (...) Oh, didn't realize there was a question. (I thought you were only making a statement about comments.) No, never got comments as part of the votes, because the mechanism for sending the form by e-mail was to use <FORM METHOD=POST (...) (25 years ago, 22-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.176)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.176)
|
|
| | E-mail Problems
|
| To All, Has anyone had problems with the e-mail sendings? I have just started getting messages at 4:00PM, and have not received any since 9:00 this morning. Thanks! Scott S. ___...___ Scott E. Sanburn-> ssanburn@cleanweb.net Systems (...) (25 years ago, 27-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.176)
|
|
| | Re: New group suggestion
|
| It seems to me that a new group for hot availability items (good price, unusual offering, etc) is not really necessary. It seems to me that that is the purpose of shopping. Of course a cross post to buy-sell-trade that a particular person is willing (...) (25 years ago, 22-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.176)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.176)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.175)
|
|
| | Re: E-mail Problems
|
| (...) There was an ncftpd log overflow today, which may have caused the loss of some outgoing news-by-mail or other small outgoing messages. Looking into it. --Todd (25 years ago, 28-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.175)
|
|
| | Re: Message rating again
|
| (...) I hope someone will correct me if I'm wrong, but currently the .test messages don't get searched (even via the .test search box) so it follows that Todd will keep this policy when the scores are included in the rankings. So rating those (...) (25 years ago, 4-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.175)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.175)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.175)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.175)
|
|
| | Lugnet for beginners
|
| Todd, Suz, et al Lugnet can be rather intimidating, IMO, to newcomers due to its massive size and scope. The Pause database aside, the news portion of Lugnet is growing every day by 400 messages or so and can leave new arrivals here with a sense of (...) (25 years ago, 28-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.175)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.175)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.175)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.175)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.174)
|
|
| | Re: Article scoring
|
| In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes: [snip a lot of math] (...) where in here does it take into account how many people are in the group? Can you weigh in the number of people who are subscribed to that group? Since they are the ones most (...) (25 years ago, 6-Mar-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.174)
|
