Results 1861 – 1880 of about 37000.
|
Search took 0.00 CPU seconds.
|
|
| |
|  
post
(score: 0.895)
|
|
 | | TM's Christmas Pirate Sale
|
| FOR SALE: 6286 Skull's Eye Schooner This 1993 set contains 892 pieces. The set is in very good condition and comes with original instructions. One red-beared minifig face has been replaced with a red-bearded face with an eyepatch. The set is (...) (26 years ago, 13-Dec-98, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.895)
|
|
| | that whole 'Christmas' Thang
|
| OK, this is probably going to hurt when the responses roll in, but in the meantime, there's a soap box, and by God(1) I'm standing on it! First off, My impression of this whole 'Christmas debate' here is that there are several people over-reacting. (...) (26 years ago, 14-Dec-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.895)
|
|
| | Re: CM in LDraw
|
| (...) Answering my own post: I was told L3P ((URL) can make the edges disappear when rendered with POV-Ray ((URL) trick is to put the DAT file into the PARTS directory. Laurentino Martins *<||:-) [mailto:lau@mail.telepac.pt] [(URL) you check the web (...) (26 years ago, 7-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.895)
|
|
| |
|
post
(score: 0.895)
|
|
| | Re: Lego Mindstorms in stock
|
| Ben Laurie wrote in message (...) Good point (after 5 min of trying to figure out that PoV = point of view... right?). Out of curiosity, and not knowing the reasons why, are there many people here that are not taking advantage of the other groups on (...) (26 years ago, 15-Dec-98, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.895)
|
|
| | RE: All-around-the-robot bump detection
|
| Hmmmmm, It's morning and I haven't had coffee yet so bear this in mind but it seems to me that this is a) a fairly cool scheme for post collision detection, and b)expandable to support direction detection through the use of 4 sensors. Imagine that (...) (26 years ago, 18-Dec-98, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.895)
|
|
| | Lugnet.robotics and the Robotics List
|
| At first I was very hesitant to have the mail list join the Lugnet robotics group, but now I am very glad it did. The increase in membership, and knowledge was a welcome improvment. It is also nice to be able to keep up with the advancements in (...) (26 years ago, 16-Dec-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.895)
|
|
| | 8880 Super Car
|
| For those interested, I still have Super car 8880. Brand new, unopened, box in good shape. The price to get one is $220, with shipment to the US included. You can mail me at jp1hamel@club-internet.fr for the holydays period. I might change of (...) (26 years ago, 16-Dec-98, to lugnet.market.auction, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.895)
|
|
| | 50's or 60's ?
|
| If anyone could give me info on this set it would be appreciated. It is set 700/0. It appears to be from the late 50's or 60's. I've searched the web fairly well and It hasn't come up . The box is about the size of your standard game board box. The (...) (26 years ago, 15-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.895)
|
|
| | time/date stamp
|
| I am both horribly unobservant and lazy. This first is indicated by the fact that I didn't notice that the time stamps are generated (apparantly) by the local time of the post. The later may be determined by the fact that I haven't dug into the back (...) (26 years ago, 18-Dec-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.895)
|
|
| | Impeachment
|
| Well, Jim, I have read your long post regarding the impeachment. I have read it several times. It is well-reasoned and argued. Still, I disagree. Let me explain, and I hope to do it without the name- calling, labeling and slander that seems to (...) (26 years ago, 30-Dec-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.895)
|
|
| | Re: Shadows in your pics (was Re: Page update)
|
| (...) Here's a big tip: increase the distance between the subject and the background. Unless you want to pick up detail from the background and the subject at the same time, it's not important for the background to be in focus, so it can be far (...) (26 years ago, 21-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.895)
|
|
| | Re: Selling in a specific area
|
| (...) I see both Matt and Todd have responded so the issue is probably settled (grin) but I'll put my two cents in as well. I think you should send it to the market.buy-sell-trade group. You can specify in the post that you really want to limit it (...) (26 years ago, 17-Dec-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.895)
|
|
| | RE: Semantic Shuttle Cost
|
| Billions and billions of apologies for everyone who has flatulently semanticised, on this list and the billions of others out there. You should remember, however, that almost anyone who plays with Lego is going to tend to be meticulously semantic. (...) (26 years ago, 16-Dec-98, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.895)
|
|
| | Re: Geez, its hard to stomach all of this
|
| (...) The history was made today, the impeachment. It'll be in history books' calendars from this point on... (...) Thanks. At least this thread/my post has confirmed that I have grown up. Heck, I was only 14 then, and fresh to the internet. :) (...) (26 years ago, 19-Dec-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.895)
|
|
| | Re: Lego(r) Master Maniac designation?
|
| Also sprach Todd Lehman: : 5. Post or transmit any unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, : defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, or indecent : information of any kind, including without limitation any : transmissions constituting (...) (26 years ago, 30-Dec-98, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.895)
|
|
| |
|
post
(score: 0.895)
|
|
| | Re: L-cad is getting irritating!
|
| OK, so I won't post a 'me to' message to L-Cad, but I can post one here. So, FWIW I think moving to Lugnet would be an excellent idea. I'm all for it! (here's an out right commitment for you Todd!) I get it now... the list server was down. Makes (...) (26 years ago, 22-Jan-99, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.895)
|
|
| | Re: Silver Anniversary Buckets - Reduced Price!
|
| Update: I was back at the same Target today (for a completely different reason) and I had to check the Lego section (as always). And what to my wondering eyes did appear but some 1999 sets! They have a good selection of the new Adventurers sets (...) (26 years ago, 17-Dec-98, to lugnet.loc.us.va.ric)
| |
|
post
(score: 0.895)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
