Subject:
|
Re: L-cad is getting irritating!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Fri, 22 Jan 1999 03:33:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
922 times
|
| |
|
|
OK, so I won't post a 'me to' message to L-Cad, but I can post one here.
So, FWIW I think moving to Lugnet would be an excellent idea. I'm all for
it! (here's an out right commitment for you Todd!)
I get it now... the list server was down. Makes sense now. I thought L-Cad
was awfully quiet today!
Kim Toll
Fredrik Glöckner wrote in message ...
> blisses@worldnet.att.net (Steve Bliss) writes:
>
> > I think I would be most happy if Todd would be willing to create a
> > new ng for L-CAD.
>
> This needs to be discussed on the L-CAD list, of course.
>
> Fredrik
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: L-cad is getting irritating!
|
| I can think of one drawback for moving to lugnet - you must have some sort of web access to subscribe to lugnet, while with l-cad you can subscribe with only an e-mail address and information on how to subscribe emailed to you by someone else. (...) (26 years ago, 22-Jan-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: L-cad is getting irritating!
|
| (...) I agree. I haven't been following the discussions concerning this on the lugnet.admin.general ng lately, though. There's so many words there, like. But count me in as a supporter of the ng. This needs to be discussed on the L-CAD list, of (...) (26 years ago, 21-Jan-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
