Subject:
|
Re: L-cad is getting irritating!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Thu, 21 Jan 1999 18:31:10 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
833 times
|
| |
|
|
John VanZwieten wrote in message ...
> What do you others think? (And don't bother posting this on L-cad yet, • it's
> still down!)
It is being talked about (check Lugnet.admin.general) and to the extent
where L-CAD would have it's *own* group nested in the Lugnet.cad hierarchy.
Second.
I have been debating whether or not to mention it on the list, but a
temporary fix (until movement to Lugnet is decided upon) is to stop the
single word, and less that useful posts. If someone needs to say "good!" or
"oh ya" or "yes" a direct post to the intended person might suffice and
leave space for more important messages. As far as I understand these
single word messages count the same as a posting of a 700 line DAT.
LINC
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: L-cad is getting irritating!
|
| Linc Smith wrote in message ... (...) Ignore that... Fredrik is right, too much text that goes nowhere. I should know since I wrote half of it. :) LINC (26 years ago, 21-Jan-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | L-cad is getting irritating!
|
| Twice this week now I've gotten a message that: "The distribution of your message dated Wed, 20 Jan 1999 21:02:47 -0600 with subject "Re: LDAO 2.0.1, et al" has been postponed because the daily message limit for the L-CAD list (50) has been (...) (26 years ago, 21-Jan-99, to lugnet.cad)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
