|
| |
|  
help, set
(score: 4.059)
|
|
 | | 9v Train status report.
|
| OK, we have been given a limited amount of information that we have been authorized to share. Now I am a fan first and Ambassador second so I am going to give you all the nuts and bolts first. After that I am going to break down each statement as I (...) (19 years ago, 30-Mar-06, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.trains, FTX) !!
| |
|
help, set
(score: 4.059)
|
|
| | BricksWest Thoughts
|
| Hey everybody! WOW! what an awesome event! I had a blast this weekend, hope you did too! Flew home last night, got to take an early flight out of Carlsbad, but that didn't matter, cause my flight from LAX was delayed - mechanical problems on two (...) (22 years ago, 20-Feb-03, to lugnet.events.brickswest)
| |
|
help, set
(score: 4.059)
|
|
| |
|
followup, header
(score: 4.003)
|
|
| | Re: CFD: lugnet.test
|
| (...) 'poster' is a special value for the 'Followup-To' header field. If an article contains Followup-To: poster then when someone posts a follow-up message, the follow-up message is e-mailed to the original poster (as given by the 'From' header (...) (26 years ago, 11-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
followup, header
(score: 4.000)
|
|
| |
|
followup, header
(score: 3.998)
|
|
| | Re: Lugnet should be MORE draconian
|
| (...) This hasn't been discussed on the list, and I'm sure there are probably a variety of opinions, but I'll offer mine. Overriding the FUT of an article alters the article's metadata item known as the "Followup-To" header. While this is not part (...) (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
followup, header
(score: 3.997)
|
|
| | Re: Excessive Cross Posting
|
| (...) I can't think of a practical example for putting multiple groups in the followup-to header. Maybe it's just me ??? I don't think jerk-proofing needs to be a *high* priority around here, although it's good to jerk-proof when it doesn't impact (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
followup, header
(score: 3.997)
|
|
| |
|
followup, header
(score: 3.997)
|
|
| | Re: Brad Justus is real
|
| (...) Maybe a flag to specify normal or detailed header info? There's more than just IP addresses in that-thar header. *I'd* like to see the followup-to header given higher visibility Steve (25 years ago, 13-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
followup, header
(score: 3.993)
|
|
| | Re: Parts
|
| (...) I posted the file as a follow-up to your request, but I did the Followup-to header incorrectly -- I pointed my reply to *just* lugnet.cad.dat, instead of *both* lugnet.cad and lugnet.cad.dat. My apologies. (...) Must be us part authors are (...) (26 years ago, 18-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
followup, header
(score: 3.992)
|
|
| |
|
followup, header
(score: 3.987)
|
|
| | Re: Todd, how do I ...
|
| (...) You posted a crossposted reply to a crossposted message. (...) That's a bad feature -- a newsreader should never remove crossposted groups unless you tell it to or unless the 'Followup-To:' header contains a more restricted list. (...) (...) (24 years ago, 2-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
followup, header
(score: 3.987)
|
|
| | Re: The name/purpose of the QOTD group
|
| (...) Yes. Long term you will probably provide an interface for members to do this easily. Till then, no problem. I'll have my lar@voyager.net account receive these. Munging the headers should not be a problem from there. It would be hard to do (...) (25 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
outlook, followup
(score: 3.987)
|
|
| |
|
outlook, followup
(score: 3.987)
|
|
| | Re: Suggestion for emails
|
| <inline> (...) Outlook 98. (...) OK, thanks Todd. I'll have a browse round outlook to see how I can turn the full header display on. Just out of interest, is the lugnet software still supposed to be able to correctly place messages received by email (...) (25 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
outlook, header
(score: 3.986)
|
|
| |
|
followup, header
(score: 3.985)
|
|
| | Re: Packaging
|
| (...) I have a feeling it's this header: (...) which Outlook is handling in a weird way. Jasper (26 years ago, 16-Feb-99, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
outlook, header
(score: 3.984)
|
|
| |
|
followup, header
(score: 3.983)
|
|
| | Re: Followup-To, ex post facto
|
| (...) By the way - does it actually move the posts, or just sets the FUT on them? From what I can see, posts that were "corrected" are still in their original newsgroups? Also, I guess a blank O-FUT header signifies that there was no original FUT, (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
followup, header
(score: 3.983)
|
