Subject:
|
Re: Followup-To, ex post facto
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.nntp
|
Date:
|
Tue, 20 Jul 2004 14:14:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4133 times
|
| |
|
|
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 01:28:11PM +0000, Jeff Findley wrote:
> In lugnet.admin.nntp, Todd Lehman wrote:
> > I have implemented a web interface feature which allows an news
> > admin* to apply a slight change to a news article: If for some
> > reason the 'Followup-To' header on a post was set incorrectly, or
> > was left empty when it should have been set, this can now be fixed.
>
> This is a great addition to the community. It's better than your
> typical moderation, which kills the discussion entirely. Hopefully
> people will have an easier time ignoring discussions they don't want
> to see, because they will be moved to the appropriate newsgroup.
By the way - does it actually move the posts, or just sets the FUT on
them? From what I can see, posts that were "corrected" are still in
their original newsgroups?
Also, I guess a blank O-FUT header signifies that there was no original
FUT, but it was added afterwards... Perhaps the web interface should do
some magic there, to make it more clear? Show a non-clickable
"<blank>" if the header is empty, or something along those lines?
--
Dan Boger
dan@peeron.com
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Followup-To, ex post facto
|
| (...) This is a great addition to the community. It's better than your typical moderation, which kills the discussion entirely. Hopefully people will have an easier time ignoring discussions they don't want to see, because they will be moved to the (...) (20 years ago, 20-Jul-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
