|
|
| dead (score: 1.069) |
|
| | Re: What's left?
|
| It has changed nearly 6 months ago, and I've updated my profile here with the new email (mdublade@yahoo.com), but for some unknown reason when I post in the newsgroups it keeps showing the old (and very dead) AOL email. (...) (22 years ago, 22-Jul-02, to lugnet.starwars)
| |
| dead (score: 1.069) |
|
| | Re: Technic's Dead (was: I need Technic)
|
| (...) Larger beams don't have axles, which then renders them inferioir to technic bricks. I'm okay with using a few liftarms and small beams when I have to. But I just find that Technic bricks are ALOT better then beams for a structual, 'chassis' (...) (22 years ago, 5-Aug-02, to lugnet.technic)
| |
| dead (score: 1.069) |
|
| | Re: Technic's Dead (was: I need Technic)
|
| "Ralph Hempel" <rhempel@bmts.com> wrote in message news:CAEBIOGHPFFJALB...mts.com... (...) Injection (...) the (...) Huh?? I'm not sure about that. For as long as I can remember, the 1x1 round plates which have come in a great variety of colors, (...) (22 years ago, 7-Aug-02, to lugnet.technic)
| |
| dead (score: 1.069) |
|
| | Re: R11 -- a brick too far
|
| (...) are they ever??? (...) i thought "we" agreed that the flag will be in a known position (dead center of the table) and that you are free to angle your robot as much as you want within the 18" starting square. (...) the reach across is a known (...) (22 years ago, 24-Jul-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| |
| dead (score: 1.069) |
|
| | Re: Technic's Dead (was: I need Technic)
|
| (...) Yes, exactly. Hey do you think we've broken new ground in child pcychology 8^) Maybe not but the fact that kids cound demand more complex sets might be somthing lego has not looked into. And more complicated sets do not mean higher prices, (...) (22 years ago, 7-Aug-02, to lugnet.technic)
| |
| dead (score: 1.069) |
|
|
| dead (score: 1.069) |
|
|
| dead (score: 1.069) |
|
| | Re: New MOC - Escher's 'Balcony'
|
| (...) That is a dead-on rendition! Nicely done. Did you see the Escher Waterfall done up in LDraw that one time? That was pretty cool as well. Again, wonderfully made! Dave K. (22 years ago, 31-Jul-02, to lugnet.build)
| |
| dead (score: 1.069) |
|
| | Back From Brickfest
|
| I'm back from the 'fest and I just wanted to drop in a quick note to say how wonderful it was. I'll definitely write more about it and provide much more detail later. I'm quite tired now and my wife definitely thinks I've spent too much time with (...) (22 years ago, 22-Jul-02, to lugnet.technic)
| |
| dead (score: 1.069) |
|
| | Re: Technic's Dead (was: I need Technic)
|
| "John Henry Kruer" <jhkruer@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:H0DHx7.Gy@lugnet.com... (...) Flex axles can be used to carry compressed air in pneumatic systems, and as cunning attachment points - see the "hook holder" on the crane cab: (URL) a great (...) (22 years ago, 5-Aug-02, to lugnet.technic)
| |
| dead (score: 1.069) |
|
| | Re: Technic's Dead (was: I need Technic)
|
| (...) And both the brick and beam have their place in the LEGO parts catalog. But what about those of us not building robots or complicated gear boxes? What about builders who want the old style Technic bricks to use as bracing or frameworks for (...) (22 years ago, 5-Aug-02, to lugnet.technic)
| |
| dead (score: 1.069) |
|
| | Re: Technic's Dead (was: I need Technic)
|
| (...) Very possibly so. Then I reiterate my previous statement. Manufacture them, put them out in bulk packs and price them accordingly. I've paid up to $1.00 U.S. per 1x16 black Technic brick at auction. Is it not possible for the company to sell (...) (22 years ago, 5-Aug-02, to lugnet.technic)
| |
| dead (score: 1.068) |
|
|
| dead (score: 1.068) |
|
|
| dead (score: 1.068) |
|
| | Re: rtlToronto13: rtlToronto/castle1
|
| "Calum Tsang" <tsangc@mie.utoronto.ca> wrote in message news:GzrnFw.DAo@lugnet.com... (...) Maybe he can't post from work? I can't figure out how to post from work. I can via the web interface, but then it sends the stupid confirmation email to my (...) (22 years ago, 24-Jul-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| |
| dead (score: 1.068) |
|
|
| dead (score: 1.068) |
|
|
| dead (score: 1.068) |
|
| | Re: Technic's Dead (was: I need Technic)
|
| (...) While it might have been fun for US (as AFOL's), for the target market (8-16 y/o) it would have made things worse. Kids can't spend $200-300 per set. Also most shops can't / won't stock such expensive sets. Perhaps in the USA it would have (...) (22 years ago, 4-Aug-02, to lugnet.technic)
| |
| dead (score: 1.068) |
|
|
| dead (score: 1.068) |