LUGNET News : Search Results: crap


Search Results: crap

Results 361 – 380 of about 1500.

Search took 0.00 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
(...) God is indeed just and worthy to judge, but I think we must be very careful when trying to ascertain God's Will in certain situations. The tendency is to anthropomorphize God, because God is so behind the confines of our limited understanding. (...) (22 years ago, 19-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

crap
(score: 0.278)

		Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
(...) Ah, I see. So you are willing to define a group by the few extremists in it. I guess then that you wouldn't have a problem calling Islam a religion that breeds violence and death, either. JOHN (22 years ago, 19-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

crap
(score: 0.278)

		Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
(...) None are so blind as those that will not see. Sick and offensive? Take a long look in the mirror, John. (...) How about a SINGLE cite from you worth a damn?! Everything you ever cite is the most slanted, venomous bile ever to spring off the (...) (22 years ago, 21-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

crap
(score: 0.278)

		Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
(...) HELLO, BRAINDAMAGED!!! You did not site a poll stating that the majority of the Palestinian population advocates the murder of innocent women and children. You sited a poll stating that the majority of Palestinians support suicide bombers. (...) (22 years ago, 21-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

crap
(score: 0.278)

		Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
(...) This is in Genesis also. Is Jesus the same God as in the Old Testament? How about the Book of the Conquest? How about a god that redeems the world only at the sacrifice of his own son or self in some psycho lamb-as-sacrifice-suicide pact? (...) (22 years ago, 21-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

crap
(score: 0.278)

		Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
(...) That is becuase most Palestinians only know what their 'government' tells them. Just as when Bush says country X is a threat and most Americans support him, when Palestinian leaders say their 'country' is being attacked by 'evil Jews', people (...) (22 years ago, 21-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

crap
(score: 0.278)

		Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
(...) And where exactly did you pull that notion from? I was simply pointing out that Christianity has just as many wacko extremists as other religions. (...) No that would be you at the bottom of this (URL) post> (...) -Mike Petrucelli (22 years ago, 21-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

crap
(score: 0.278)

		Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
The poblem is not in my or Dave!'s logic, it lies possibly in the language or words we are using to express our ideas. Obviously, it is easier to talk about things in the positive rather than negative because in the negative you have to conjure an (...) (22 years ago, 21-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

crap
(score: 0.278)

		Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
(...) Again, as a believer you are trying to frame the issue as circling around the issue of belief or faith -- and it is just not so. I am not saying that God doesn't exist. I am saying that there is no evidence of that possibility. Crying about (...) (22 years ago, 21-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

crap
(score: 0.278)

		Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
(...) Hi Dave, As requested here's a book for you...It's scope is highly scientific. "Darwin's Leap of Faith" by John Ankerberg and John Weldon. I'll try to pick up the book you suggested as well. If you get this book and would like to comment (...) (22 years ago, 20-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

crap
(score: 0.278)

		Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
(...) I'll see what I can come up with for you. (...) It is ONE central requirement, yet Random House and I are stating that "adhering to the teachings of Christ" is also an essential requirement to be catagorized as a "Christian." (...) I'll check (...) (22 years ago, 20-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

crap
(score: 0.278)

		Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
(...) I think that you and I went down this road (URL) before.> Bear in mind that the thread took place before you and I made peace, so it might come across with more bitterness than is now the case. (...) Perhaps not, but it definitely eliminates (...) (22 years ago, 20-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

crap
(score: 0.278)

		Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
(...) Right, but by that same token, consider this: In statement A, the conditional thing that does or does not exist is God. In statement B, the conditional thing that does or does not exist is belief. (...) I disagree, believe it or not! 8^) I (...) (22 years ago, 20-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

crap
(score: 0.278)

		Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
(...) If you can recommend any such books I would be greatly interested to explore them. I would steer you away from such authors as William Lane Craig, William Dembski, or Michael Denton, all of whom commit grievous logical and statistical errors. (...) (22 years ago, 20-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

crap
(score: 0.278)

		Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
(...) Come on, Tom. I have a lot of faults, but I wouldn't say "pride" is one of them. In practice I am a pretty tolerant person, and in theory it shouldn't matter what I believe. As far as Christianity breeding violence and death, I don't see it. (...) (22 years ago, 18-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

crap
(score: 0.278)

		Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
(...) Understood and agreed...Using Atheism was a bad example...most everything else I said has been snipped. Again I refute Richard's statement that merely calling yourself a Christian makes you a Christian and refer you to the 2 definitions for (...) (22 years ago, 20-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

crap
(score: 0.278)

		Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys wrote: Richard has put his finger exactly on the problem, but I was interested in the underlying logic of the questaion and decided to go ahead anyway for clarity's sake. (...) I'm afraid that this notation (...) (22 years ago, 20-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

crap
(score: 0.278)

		Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
What the ****?! Belief has nothing to do with anything. Get it through your thick skulls. The existence or non-existence of a possible god is not so far an observed phenomena. End of story. If you want to believe in the bogeyman in the sky, go right (...) (22 years ago, 20-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

crap
(score: 0.278)

		Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
The family: myth and reality (URL) Families in the real world are often not what the policy makers think. And 'the family' everywhere is under immense stress from rapid economic, social and environmental changes. In this Year of the Family Jodi (...) (22 years ago, 20-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

crap
(score: 0.278)

		Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
(...) Justin, your comment betrays a fundamental misunderstanding about the nature of atheism. Consider the following statements: A: I believe that God does not exist. B: I do not believe that God exists. Do you see that these two statements are (...) (22 years ago, 20-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

crap
(score: 0.278)

More: Next Page >>