To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 22483
22482  |  22484
Subject: 
Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 21 Oct 2003 04:31:42 GMT
Viewed: 
1020 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
  
  
  
  
  
   As far as Christianity breeding violence and death, I don’t see it.

I second that!

Hmmm... let’s see, the KKK, neo-Nazis, yep no Christians breeding violence and death at all.

Ah, I see. So you are willing to define a group by the few extremists in it.

And where exactly did you pull that notion from? I was simply pointing out that Christianity has just as many wacko extremists as other religions.

I think from your equivocation of “Christianity” with “Christians”. Christianity as a religion doesn’t breed violence and death. Wackos calling themselves “Christians” might. There is a distinction there.

  
   I guess then that you wouldn’t have a problem calling Islam a religion that breeds violence and death, either.

No that would be you at the bottom of this post

This is what worries me: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/977522/posts

That is becuase most Palestinians only know what their ‘government’ tells them. Just as when Bush says country X is a threat and most Americans support him, when Palestinian leaders say their ‘country’ is being attacked by ‘evil Jews’, people support ‘the ultimate sacrifice’ to defend their ‘country’ from ‘evil’.
  
There is quite a difference between Christianity and its extremists wackos (who are always summarily condemned by Christians), and Islam and its attitudes towards its own extremists.

No there isn’t really. The only difference is most Muslims actually follow the tenets of their religion while most christians conveintly ignore the stuff they don’t like. Both religions are based on the same fundamental belief of doing no harm to the innocent. (There are both derived from the same ancient religion after all)
  
Why won’t the Muslim world flat out condemn terrorism and work to end it?

Most Muslims that live in freedom and know the truth do condemn terrorism that results in the killing of innocent lives, as it is against their religon.

-Mike Petrucelli



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
 
(...) Dude, your equivocations are sick and offensive! Americans would never support Bush if he advocated the slaughter of innocent women and children! What are you smoking? (...) HELLO, MCFLY???!!! Is there anyone home, Mike? I just got done (...) (21 years ago, 21-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
 
(...) I think from your equivocation of "Christianity" with "Christians". Christianity as a religion doesn't breed violence and death. Wackos calling themselves "Christians" might. There is a distinction there. (...) This is what worries me: (URL) (...) (21 years ago, 21-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

220 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR