LUGNET News : Search Results: crap


Search Results: crap

Results 1061 – 1080 of 1516.

Search took 0.00 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
(...) Here are my results: 1. Secular Humanism (100%) 2. Unitarian Universalism (96%) 3. Liberal Quakers (83%) 4. Mainline to Liberal Christian Protestants (83%) 5. Nontheist (76%) 6. Theravada Buddhism (67%) 7. Neo-Pagan (64%) 8. Christian Science (...) (21 years ago, 16-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

crap
(score: 0.717)

		Re: Holy crap! Four out of five scientists claim....
(...) That's called special pleading, and it's a fallacy. It's a double-standard based in circular reasoning and cannot be used in any logically sound argument. (...) Well, that's as much a statement of faith as anything I've heard you make, and it (...) (21 years ago, 16-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

crap
(score: 0.717)

		Re: Holy crap! Four out of five scientists claim....
(...) Well, let's disclaim once again that science isn't in the business of proving anything as 100% fact, so I reserve the statement that science will always permit modification to existing theory. Science hasn't yet produced a supernova in the (...) (21 years ago, 16-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

crap
(score: 0.716)

		Re: Holy crap! Four out of five scientists claim....
(...) But the key difference is that I am saying "I accept that the universe may always have existed," rather than "I believe that God has always existed." I offer and accept the universe's existence as a possibility, but I don't put faith in that (...) (21 years ago, 16-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

crap
(score: 0.716)

		Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
(...) That's pretty funny. I consider you largely irrelevant to my life and strong feelings. And indeed, as I thought you might, you are backpedalling -- just not in a way that I find socially acceptable or redeeming. I don't have anything else to (...) (21 years ago, 16-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

crap
(score: 0.716)

		Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
(...) Wow, I out Scientologied you with 39%. How weird is that. -Mike Petrucelli (21 years ago, 16-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

crap
(score: 0.716)

		Re: the BEST two days of my life.
(...) OI've used many mp3 decoders, but I used Winamp first and I keep coming back to it. I do turn off all the extraneous crap like visualizations and such. After I turned off the web view in Windows explorer, there were no more issues--I could (...) (21 years ago, 15-Sep-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

crap
(score: 0.716)

		Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
(...) John, I tried to follow this debate as close as possible...forgive me if I’ve missed something. I agree with your general position that God is unchanging, however as far as I read, you’ve only reffered to the God of the Bible as a God of love. (...) (21 years ago, 17-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

crap
(score: 0.716)

		Re: Holy Crap! Sacred Cow Makes the Best Hamburger!
Where we find out some odd things about ourselves: Smorgasboard Approach to Religion Award (highest overall percentage of compatiblity) -->Bruce<-- 60% Bah Humbug Award (lowest overall percentage) -- Hop-Frog 45% Most Likely to Sacrifice a Virgin to (...) (21 years ago, 17-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

crap
(score: 0.716)

		Re: Holy Crap! Sacred Cow Makes the Best Hamburger!
I suppose one could also analyze this from the standpoint of death... Most Likely to Get Roaring Drunk in Valhalla -->Bruce<-- Most Likely to Go to Heaven JOHN Most Likely to Be Reincarnated - Mike Most Likely to Achieve Nirvana -->Bruce<-- (which (...) (21 years ago, 17-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

crap
(score: 0.716)

		Re: First Post! (And a place to get current sets at less than MSRP)
(...) Welcome aboard, Keith! (...) The 4404 is a very nice set. I put mine together the day after I got it and love it, it's very nicely done. I loved Model Team sets, so this is a real treat. (...) (Here you go Chris...Asian Power. You can't mock (...) (21 years ago, 13-Sep-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

crap
(score: 0.716)

		Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
(...) Oh, great. Now I have to watch it twice. Thanks, guys. Dave! (21 years ago, 17-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

crap
(score: 0.716)

		Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
(...) Cool! Between "Secular Humanism" and "Nontheist," we have you 50% of the way to reason! 8^) Dave! (21 years ago, 17-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

crap
(score: 0.716)

		Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
(...) Perhaps not the only ones. I guess it depends on one's perspective... General Casts War in Religious Terms (URL) Yet the former commander and 13-year veteran of the Army's top-secret Delta Force is also an outspoken evangelical Christian who (...) (21 years ago, 17-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

crap
(score: 0.716)

		Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
(...) Just so no one misses out on my righteous indignation, (URL) here's> my stupendouslyly witty literary swipe at this very same issue. (...) As Al Franken has rightly pointed out, it wasn't God who selected Dubya; it was Clarence Thomas. (URL) (...) (21 years ago, 17-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

crap
(score: 0.716)

		Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
(...) I second that! (...) aren't perfect, and to expect Christians to act perfectly is a little over the (...) Which (in a world wide perspective) is certainly not the case with some other religions. Further, the above statement shows a complete (...) (21 years ago, 19-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

crap
(score: 0.716)

		Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
(...) Hmmm... let's see, the KKK, neo-Nazis, yep no Christians breeding violence and death at all. (...) Are you serious? (Personally I think you are being sarcastic but I don't know) I mean granted many living in dictatorships can't publicly decry (...) (21 years ago, 19-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

crap
(score: 0.716)

		Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
(...) Brother/sister unions are taboo in most cultures AFAIK. That could point to a genetic component that discourages such unions thereby avoiding inbreeding. Or, all of the brothers and sisters who tried to procreate produced (...) (21 years ago, 24-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

crap
(score: 0.716)

		Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
(...) Okay, but you'd agree that it is taboo in our culture? If so, to what would you attest that value? I'll have to do a little research, but I think the taboo extends beyond any Judeo-Christian influence. (...) I don't follow you. Are you saying (...) (21 years ago, 24-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

crap
(score: 0.716)

		Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
(...) Yes, incest is prohibited in Leviticus. So are a lot of things BTW, like eating lobster;-) I think the issue predates the Bible. And I did a little research-- it appears that incest is taboo in virtually every culture (except in some (...) (21 years ago, 24-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

crap
(score: 0.716)

More: Next Page >>