Subject:
|
Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap in California)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 24 Oct 2003 19:37:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
745 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richard Marchetti wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
| |
Brother/sister unions are taboo in most cultures AFAIK. That could point to
a genetic component that discourages such unions thereby avoiding
inbreeding.
|
I’m no expert by any stretch but I think this is false on both counts.
|
Okay, but you’d agree that it is taboo in our culture? If so, to what would
you attest that value? I’ll have to do a little research, but I think the taboo
extends beyond any Judeo-Christian influence.
| |
It’s my understanding that if enough inbreeding occurs you actually get the
same result as carefully avoiding inbreeding. I think there was evidence of
this from observations of Pygmy cultures.
|
I don’t follow you. Are you saying that carefully avoiding inbreeding is
useless given a limited genetic pool?
JOHN
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
220 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
