|
 | | Re: Wake-up Australia!!!
|
| (...) It's a week since I last posted.... I've checked .loc.au every day (but yesterday), so I can't blame my wildly interesting life for providing distractions! (...) I was presuming that it was because of the grey thing. (...) The grey thing, or (...) (20 years ago, 9-Feb-04, to lugnet.loc.au, FTX)
| |
|  
bionicle
(score: 0.302)
|
|
| | Better Pictures...
|
| There are some better pictures of the 4 new Technic sets: (URL) that I have seen them closer...nothing special in that mini-technic set...the airplane is nice and actually the Bionicle blades look good...the 4WD is nice but there isn't anything that (...) (20 years ago, 5-Feb-04, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
bionicle
(score: 0.302)
|
|
| | New Technic crane
|
| Dear Lego I think you've made a big mistake on the new crane truck using a bionicle hook rather than the metal Technic hook that already exists. (URL) spoil the look of a set for the sake of one part? Seem's to me like just another example of Lego's (...) (20 years ago, 5-Feb-04, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| |
|
bionicle
(score: 0.302)
|
|
| | Re: Bionicle Claw with Axle
|
| (...) These are pretty complex parts so I agree. I have, in the past, offered compensation to parts authors for creating parts I needed created. I don't recall where I made the offer but I think it was in the CAD hierarchy, not the market one. That (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
| |
|
bionicle
(score: 0.302)
|
|
| | Re: Bionicle Claw with Axle
|
| (...) If I want to pay someone to create the part for me, is it still appropriate to post in the CAD forum or should I be posting to Marketplace? I felt uncomfortable paying someone, since LDraw is supposed to be a community effort. But I REALLY (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
| |
|
bionicle
(score: 0.302)
|
|
| | New crane truck
|
| Dear Lego I think you've made a big mistake on the new crane truck using a bionicle hook rather than the metal Technic hook that already exists. see (URL) spoil the look of a set for the sake of one part? Seem's to me like just another example of (...) (20 years ago, 5-Feb-04, to lugnet.lego)
| |
|
bionicle
(score: 0.302)
|
|
| | Re: Better Pictures...
|
| Thank you Lego! The more I see of these sets the easier it will be not to buy any of them. Bionicle parts have no business in true Technic sets. They are different themes and should be kept that way! Cutting corners by using those parts in sets like (...) (20 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.general)
| |
|
bionicle
(score: 0.302)
|
|
| | Re: Discoveries on Dino-world part II
|
| Hey Patrick, Just terrific stuff! The creature and body part modelling is great! You used Galidor and I didn't even notice it right away. I love how you turned around the Plesiosaur jaw too. I see you've been separating and saving the trans Bionicle (...) (20 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.space)
| |
|
bionicle
(score: 0.302)
|
|
| |
|
bionicle
(score: 0.302)
|
|
| | Re: Another new colour in set 8385?
|
| (...) There are a wide number of metallic greyish colors that have been released. The six BIONICLE Toa masks were released briefly in a metallic "silver" that has a distinct green tint. Many TECHNIC parts (panels, Roborider heads, liftarms, (...) (20 years ago, 1-Feb-04, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
bionicle
(score: 0.301)
|
|
| |
|
bionicle
(score: 0.301)
|
|
| | Re: New Technic sets
|
| First and foremost I have to say that my personal preference is for studded parts. Studless parts definitely are useful in some cases, but for me they will never be as good, or produce a finished creation that is as good as one using brick based (...) (20 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.technic)
| |
|
bionicle
(score: 0.301)
|
|
| | Re: New Technic crane
|
| (...) Lego doesn't deserve to get respect from any people. People have said polite things over the course of the years and Lego is just not listening. Drastic measures should be taken!!! I agree with the other people...why did Lego ruin a perfectly (...) (20 years ago, 5-Feb-04, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| |
|
bionicle
(score: 0.301)
|
|
| | Re: New Technic sets
|
| (...) I'm wondering how you arrived at your conclusion Gregory? Do you own any of the 2003 Technic sets? The new small yellow sets introduced in 2004, ie. the 8451 dump truck, and 8453 front-end loader are great and affordable sets, with good (...) (20 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.technic)
| |
|
bionicle
(score: 0.301)
|
|
| | Re: Better Pictures...
|
| I agree with Greg that not one of these sets looks good to me either. I miss brick beams. I also think the fairing pieces in place of brick beams actually detract from the model. It doesn't look as "solid" as the old stuff. The two metal hooks in (...) (20 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
bionicle
(score: 0.301)
|
|
| |
|
bionicle
(score: 0.301)
|
|
| |
|
bionicle
(score: 0.301)
|
|
| | Re: New Technic crane
|
| (...) I'm curious as to how you've drawn that conclusion. While there have been a lot of decisions I didn't like lately, there also have been a lot that I did. I think they listen a lot. What do you call the designer sets? That, to me, is evidence (...) (20 years ago, 5-Feb-04, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| |
|
bionicle
(score: 0.301)
|
|
| | Re: elenco vecchi set del negozio articoli bimbo
|
| (...) Non ne vale la pena (...) Te lo tirano dietro su BrickLink per meno di 15$ (...) Interessante (...) Non male (...) Da prendere di corsa! (...) Idem come il primo (...) Century Skyway... da prendere se te lo ribassassero a 100, così è un po' (...) (20 years ago, 5-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.it.itlug)
| |
|
bionicle
(score: 0.301)
|
|
| |
|
bionicle
(score: 0.301)
|
