Subject:
|
Re: New Technic crane
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.dear-lego
|
Date:
|
Thu, 5 Feb 2004 20:12:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2514 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.dear-lego, David Koudys wrote:
> <snip>
>
> >
> > Seem's to me like just another example of Lego's problems.
>
>
> <snip>
>
> Can we please stop with the 'another example of Lego's problems' already. "Oh
> my newly purchased Lego set had the instructions folded wrong! Just another
> example of Lego's problems!"
>
> If you (general you, not directed at poster specifically) doesn't appreciate
> something that TLC did, then say that--"I didn't appreciate the hook! Maybe TLC
> should reconsider using this other hook instead--in my opinion it would make a
> better set overall for these specific reasons"
>
> You catch more flies with honey than vinegar. If someone started with "Oh,
> another one of your problems is this!!" I'll tune you right out. "What? You
> said something??" (or do my Bobby DeN imitation--"You talkin' ta me?? There's
> no one else here... you must be talkin' ta me...")
>
> Anyway, when asking for something, it's usually better to phrase it as a polite
> request than in an accusatory manner.
>
> But that's my humble opinion.
>
> Dave K
Lego doesn't deserve to get respect from any people. People have said polite
things over the course of the years and Lego is just not listening. Drastic
measures should be taken!!! I agree with the other people...why did Lego ruin a
perfectly wicked truck with a stupid Bionicle hook!!! I too hope that Lego would
actually almost be on the the verge of bankruptcy so they could release what
stupid mistakes they are making. They have released some nice sets in 2004...but
yet again...one of their problems...they just have to ruin them by making more
specialized parts (World City...Bionicle...etc.), changing colours, adding
skin-toned mini-figs and all of these things
What's wrong with sticking with the old-fashioned Lego???!!!!
Steve
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: New Technic crane
|
| (...) And if you have a grievance against someone, I will reiterate--a politely and non-accusatory response is a better way of working towards an amicable solution for all parties involved, than a rant. Ranting does have its place in the world, but (...) (21 years ago, 5-Feb-04, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | Re: New Technic crane
|
| (...) Seems to me they are. Seems to me they're even responding to some of it. Just because they don't bend to every one of oue whims doesn't mean they aren't listening. (...) What do you propose? Storming the castle, putting the executive to the (...) (21 years ago, 6-Feb-04, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New Technic crane
|
| <snip> (...) <snip> Can we please stop with the 'another example of Lego's problems' already. "Oh my newly purchased Lego set had the instructions folded wrong! Just another example of Lego's problems!" If you (general you, not directed at poster (...) (21 years ago, 5-Feb-04, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
