LUGNET News : Search Results: all rights are property rights


Search Results: all rights are property rights

Results 921 – 940 of about 136000.

Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: Corporate vs Individual liability
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz writes: (case study #1) (...) Corporation, yes. CEO? This is obviously where we are disagreeing. How can liability be assigned essentially at random to an individual? Why the CEO and not some other company (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, property
(score: 2.540)

		Re: 2000 scans
(...) If you think about the vast number of television programmes that spew forth from America and pollute the rest of the world.. then it isn't that suprising that people have this opinion. Almost every other idiot on television is an American, (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.540)

		Re: Corporate vs Individual liability
James Brown wrote in message ... (...) is (...) Well, the owbers or stockholders are responsible also, though in many cases a stockholder's responsibility is less since he isn't directly running the company they way the CEO is. (...) refuses (...) (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, property
(score: 2.540)

		Re: "Free Web Space"
Thanks for your help. I'd already given up on the "free" web space providers. Some actually ask you to sign away all publishing rights on the material uploaded - not a real problem to me I must admit. I think I will go with pair, I got 30mb for (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.market.theory)

all, rights
(score: 2.540)

		Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
(...) I should have realised it sooner. However, it's best to remember, that when discussing theory, it's best to think in "theoretical" boxes rather than actual ones. (...) Heh. (...) They're quite possibly fairly irrelevant on Lugnet, what with it (...) (25 years ago, 22-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.540)

		Re: Taxes from Lego auctions?
David Eaton wrote in message ... (...) not be (...) in (...) 5 to (...) line (...) independantly. (...) (as (...) to (...) don't (...) "should" (...) they (...) While I agree to a point with you, I also agree to a point with Chris. I don't think (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.540)

		Re: GATS Tampa Show...
Seriously, what are you going to do when TLC introduces their new line of 8 wides trains? It's inevitable. Evolution and all that jazz... I mean, if TLC would get serious about producing model train sets, would you want them 6 wide and toylike? Why (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.trains)

all, rights
(score: 2.540)

		linux-lnp: select() vs. SIGIO ( was Re: Call for debugging support )
(...) Uuh, there was a little bug in my test program. Once again, i learned i have to read gcc´s warnings carefully. On linux, select() suffers exactly the same thing as SIGIO. If the hardware fifo of the uart is enabled, and there is a stream of (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)

all, rights
(score: 2.539)

		Novità da Cafepress
Ciao, brutte notizie da Cafepress. Mi hanno scritto pochi giorni fa per dirmi che il nostro negozio conteneva immagini protette da copyright e che l'uso di questo materiale era temporaneamente disabilitato: [snip] We recently learned that your (...) (19 years ago, 7-Dec-05, to lugnet.org.it.itlug)

rights, property
(score: 2.539)

		Re: An Alternative..
Sorry Richard, this has been sitting in my draft folder... Richard Franks wrote in message ... (...) <snip> (...) country (...) agree, (...) almost (...) That depends on geography. The Federal government doesn't exert that much control here. (...) (...) (25 years ago, 31-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, property
(score: 2.539)

		Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
(...) Superheros, (...) favorite (...) scale (...) I'm sorry but I personally would have to respectfully disagree with modelling millatry items on ethical grounds. Modelling classic items maybe. It is one thing I admire about The Lego Group is that (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)

all, rights
(score: 2.539)

		Re: Goodness of Man? (was: Re: Merry Christmas from the Libertarian Party
Matt, (...) Yes, but without the Declaration, we would have no Constitution, or Bill of Rights. Clearly the intent of the Founding Fathers is here.. but this isn't what I was talking about. (...) I think that the Constitution outlined the concept of (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.538)

		Help with Free Webspace TOS agreements and Copyrights
Hey Y'all: Well, I am trying to get together a largish lego site and am looking for free space for it. I have been to both Xoom and Geocities and read their TOS statements. Does anyone have anything interesting to say about the manner in which they (...) (25 years ago, 25-Dec-99, to lugnet.publish)

all, rights
(score: 2.538)

		Re: Itty-bitty LEGO set looker-upper
(...) I don't know of any way, no, but in a former life I used to do lots of Win32 GUI programming, so I'm going to bet that it's possible that there's a tool out there somewhere (something akin to WinSpy++) that would let a user choose a window and (...) (25 years ago, 13-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.database)

all, property
(score: 2.538)

		Re: Goodness of Man? (was: Re: Merry Christmas from the Libertarian Party
(...) I am not for the leftist view of government taxing us to death for everyone's ability to have health care, education, etc. I work two jobs, I am starting my own business, and I think the left's view of these being rights is both absurd and (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.538)

		Re: Brad - TLC needs to minimize packaging
(...) I think that it's not so much a case of the consumer wanting more packaging, than that the companies perceive that larger packages sell better because the stupid consumer thinks he's getting a better deal. As far as government regulation of (...) (25 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.538)

		Re: "Justice Probes eBay for Antitrust"
(...) I have no issues with you personally either Larry and this is a civilized discussion not a "brawl" or a flame war - I am somewhat toward the libertarian view myself (I'm not dogmatic about anything except how cool the Internet and Legos are (...) (25 years ago, 5-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.theory, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, property
(score: 2.538)

		Re: Goodness of Man? (was: Re: Merry Christmas from the Libertarian Party
(...) Well, it speaks (Looking at my CATO supplied Constitution & Bill of Rights) , "the separate and equal Station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God...." for one (In the Declaration of Independence). The concept of natural law, in (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.538)

		Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
(...) What a cop out. Why wait? You'll NEVER figure out ALL the details, nor will anyone else. All you can do is set up a system in which there is a clear, and just, way to resolve issues, and rights are protected. That's what Libertarians are (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.537)

		Re: Brad - TLC needs to minimize packaging
(...) I have little sympathy for stupid consumers. I see too many of them at my second job for that. "This was supposed to be 80% off, there was a sign." Lets say they have a Christmas sweater. (Actual example) I went back there to see, and it was (...) (25 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.537)

More: Next Page >>