|
 | | Re: Government's role [Was: Re: What happened?]
|
| (...) What gives the government the right to discriminate among contracts? It is then making a moral judgement that one sort of free will behaviour non rights damaging behaviour is better than another. Please address this fundamental point. (...) No (...) (25 years ago, 17-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|  
rights, property
(score: 3.964)
|
|
| | LEGO wins in Chinese High Court
|
| Crossposted to lugnet.mediawatch ---...--- (...) BBC News Online Tuesday, 21 January, 2003, 13:16 GMT Lego Defeats the Chinese Pirates * photo caption: Children first got their hands on Lego bricks in 1958 Danish toy-maker Lego Company has won a (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.964)
|
|
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.964)
|
|
| | Re: LEGO section starting on Compuserve
|
| The Compuserve copyright rules and regulations explicitly state that owners of material uploaded to Compuserve retain ownership and rights. Compuserve gains only a compilation copyright. Here is the relevent document: ------- Begin ------- (...) (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.963)
|
|
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.963)
|
|
| | Re: THE FOUNDRY . . .
|
| (...) You are very correct. I cannot label a toy "valkyrie" or "Zaku" if they are trademarked or copyrighted. But in this case they are not. If you go to the US Patent and Trademark Office and do a search you will note that "Zaku" is nowhere to be (...) (23 years ago, 5-Jan-02, to lugnet.build.mecha)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.963)
|
|
| | neighbors
|
| so i am a pretty big fan of living in the city (which is odd since i am an ecologist/conservation biologist). Anyway, the rental property next to us recently had a tenent change and is now occupied by a group of undergraduates who are very loud and (...) (22 years ago, 23-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.963)
|
|
| | Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?
|
| (...) Ouch, Larry. >:-P (...) I know it was a joke, but bear with me for a moment... Would Libertarians be tolerant of my lifestyle if I were to become a tyrranical conquorer bent upon stamping out Libertarianism and setting up camp on your private (...) (25 years ago, 10-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.963)
|
|
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.963)
|
|
| | Re: Rolling Blackouts
|
| (...) Hmm. I'm not sure that migratory species (or non-migratory) could have owners, even in a Libertarian ideal; at least, not until we have a much better understanding of ecosystem interaction. It opens up many difficult questions, among the (...) (23 years ago, 16-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.963)
|
|
| | Re: Quiet in here
|
| (...) radical (...) No more than you meant that anyone religious is a right wing extremist. The problem in this matter is that only the outrageous get the attention and taint the entire issue. (...) Morality tanscends the state. It's not just a (...) (25 years ago, 25-Feb-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.963)
|
|
| | Re: Bad News for Brickbay!?
|
| (...) Actually, they have plenty of legal ground. Again, similarly, I am not a lawyer. (And also a Canadian!) But I have been to lectures about intellectual property, and it is my understanding that trademark infringement is based on similar service (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jan-02, to lugnet.market.brickshops, lugnet.general)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.963)
|
|
| | Re: Selling MOC Instructions? Your Thoughts?
|
| (...) In general, no. But in your case, I suspect there is a problem. Not with LDraw/MLcad, but with the fact that you are modeling a toy with its own copyright and trademark issues. I don't think that Robotech toys or other products are currently (...) (23 years ago, 18-Dec-01, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.963)
|
|
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.963)
|
|
| | Re: Apology.
|
| (...) I believe you are incorrect. First, if it's against the spirit of the ToU for a spammer to harvest email addresses against the will of the participants, it's against the spirit of the ToU for an UNspammer to harvest a single email address (...) (23 years ago, 25-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.963)
|
|
| | Re: Separation of Church and State
|
| (...) Absolutely! And if someone tries to prevent those people from praying, I'll be first in line to defend their right to pray as they choose. The right to worship is Constitutionally protected, even on school property (provided that it's not done (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.963)
|
|
| | Re: The Free Super Chiefs
|
| (...) I think it's still debatable. Of course I mentioned that depending on the circumstances, I would take the effort to help the sender correct their mistake. While I don't call my self a Christian, it is certainly in my values to try and be fair. (...) (23 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.963)
|
|
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.963)
|
|
| | Re: IP ( was Re: LP POINT 1
|
| (...) Many people are "exploited" if you define it widely enough. Isn't being an employee exploitation? Actually, weren't you being exploited by the system when you were going to school for free? You were being incented by the masses to behave in a (...) (24 years ago, 6-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.963)
|
|
| | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
| (...) Good. So do I. Fortunately, that wasn't what I said. What I said was that if you are not willing to suffer for your art, you are not a worthy ARTIST, not that your art isn't worthy. I would say that to be true for any endeavour. If you expect (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.963)
|
